2020
DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2020.1771576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urea–hydroxyapatite nanohybrid as an efficient nutrient source inCamellia sinensis(L.) Kuntze (tea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baobab plants sprayed with nHAP showed a significant increase in several growth traits (plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves per plant, leaf area, root length, total dry weight) compared to conventional P fertilizers. A conceptually similar study was conducted on Camelia sinensis [56]. Different P fertilization strategies were tested, which included comparing conventional fertilizers and nHAP, and a different fractionation of doses.…”
Section: Nano-hydroxyapatite As Source Of Phosphorusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baobab plants sprayed with nHAP showed a significant increase in several growth traits (plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves per plant, leaf area, root length, total dry weight) compared to conventional P fertilizers. A conceptually similar study was conducted on Camelia sinensis [56]. Different P fertilization strategies were tested, which included comparing conventional fertilizers and nHAP, and a different fractionation of doses.…”
Section: Nano-hydroxyapatite As Source Of Phosphorusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous research work done by our team, we have reported that hydroxyapatite-urea (HA-Urea) nanohybrid is capable of releasing nitrogen 12 times slower compared to pure urea confirming the applicability of HA-urea nanohybrids as a controlled release fertilizer (Kottegoda et al, 2013, Gunaratne et al, 2016, Kottegoda et al, 2014b. Further, urea-HA nano-systems were developed, incorporated layered materials, and investigated the efficacy of these new formulations using rice and tea as model crops (Kottegoda et al, 2012, Madusanka et al, 2017, Raguraj et al, 2020. Moreover, HA nanoparticles have been coated with citric acid and utilized as a slow-release P plant nutrient composition to improve the growth efficiency of corn (Samavini et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…CRFs which are sometimes referred to as slow-release fertilisers (SRFs) have been developed as an approach towards solving the issues that arise from the application of conventional fertilisers [85,[88][89][90]. CRFs are designed with the aim to release the active ingredient at a controlled rate and to support by providing adequate nutrients for crop production [91,92]. Comparing three treatments each receiving 105 N ha −1 year −1 from oilcake, Wu et al (2018) found that the plots receiving 120 kg N CRF ha −1 year −1 had 31% higher yields (4.1 t ha −1 year −1 ) than those (3.1 t ha −1 year −1 ) in plots receiving 345 kg N-urea ha −1 year −1 [93].…”
Section: Intercropping With Legumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the plots receiving 345 kg N CRF ha −1 year −1 had the lowest yield (2.9 t ha −1 year −1 ), which was associated with an inhibition of photosynthesis. In Sri Lanka, Raguraj et al (2020) noted a 10-17% yield increase from the application of urea-coated "nanohybrid" CRF fertilisers compared with standard fertiliser treatments [92]. In China, Liu et al (2012) [30] reported a 6-13% decrease in yields from CRFs-treated crops when compared with conventional fertilisers in a two-year study, but the difference was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Intercropping With Legumesmentioning
confidence: 99%