2009
DOI: 10.1109/tkde.2009.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

URBE: Web Service Retrieval Based on Similarity Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
163
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
163
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Plebani and Pernici (2009) presented a method to measure the similarity between two web services. This method is used for the replacement of services in case of failure.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Plebani and Pernici (2009) presented a method to measure the similarity between two web services. This method is used for the replacement of services in case of failure.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process extracts the semantic relations between WST entities. This service is implemented as described in (Plebani & Pernici, 2009). The matching service returns the degree of similarity between two entities as a number in the interval [0,1].…”
Section: Assistant System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first group, there exists a group of previously chosen similar services; when a service fails to work at runtime, it is replaced by another based on user context or QoS [8,9]. In the second group, similar services are selected dynamically [3,4,5,6]. In the third group, the external behavior of a Web service like execution paths or its conversations with other services is considered.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, there is a need to seek a way to know the user's preferences about QoS. In most studies such as [3,4,5,6], finding similar services is based on functional similarity in which a number of the best services (k) are selected and introduced to the user. The user then has to select one of them based on his/her preferences about QoS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%