1988
DOI: 10.30861/9780860545576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urbanisation in Early Historic India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, differences in urbanism also existed between these neighbouring areas. Settlements around Pauni conform to the ‘classic’ model of early historic urbanism, with a large, fortified city dominating the immediate area (Erdosy 1988; Allchin 1995); around Mandhal, however, a much smaller fortified centre at Adam was part of a more diffuse distribution of sites, indicating more localised networks of resourcing, production and exchange. By contrast, developments around Chammak continued to follow an earlier, Iron Age pattern of settlement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Yet, differences in urbanism also existed between these neighbouring areas. Settlements around Pauni conform to the ‘classic’ model of early historic urbanism, with a large, fortified city dominating the immediate area (Erdosy 1988; Allchin 1995); around Mandhal, however, a much smaller fortified centre at Adam was part of a more diffuse distribution of sites, indicating more localised networks of resourcing, production and exchange. By contrast, developments around Chammak continued to follow an earlier, Iron Age pattern of settlement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In particular, texts like the Arthaśāstra and the Mānavadharmaśāstra (a legal text, possibly redacted in northern India, second century BCE to second century CE) make reference to a common settlement pattern in which administrative centers are appointed for the coordination of a number of satellite villages: for instance, a thānīya was to be located as a center for eight hundred villages, a droṇamukha for four hundred villages, a kārvaṭika for two hundred villages, and a saṃgrahaṇa for ten villages (KA 2:1.4). This hierarchical and heterarchical settlement pattern, mirroring an increasing socioeconomic complexity, was archaeologically documented by George Erdosy (1988) in the district of Allahabad around the city of Kauśāmbī in northern India, where such a multi-tiered settlement pattern was apparently well established by 400 BCE (Erdosy 1995: 107).5…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…After the decline of Arabian maritime power, the European traders came to Asia in the late 15th century, but their commercial activities were limited to small trading stations along coastal and river ports until the mid-18th century [73] (pp. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Meanwhile, the vast areas of South and Southeast Asia were all included in China's massive tributary trading network, and numerous ports of these areas were connected with the lower Ganges Valley through the ports of Chittagong and Sonargaon [71] (pp.…”
Section: Analysis Of Centrifugal Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic archaeological studies of early historic settlement patterns in the middle and lower Ganges Valley have been conducted by scholars such as Chakrabarti [30,31], Lal [32], Erdosy [33] and Allchin [34]. Colonial economic models based on statistical data from the British Indian period have been widely used by scholars such as Raza [35] to analyze the structure and growth patterns of regional urban systems in India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%