2002
DOI: 10.1017/s135913550300188x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban visualization and public inquiries: the case of the Heron Tower, London

Abstract: Computers are now used routinely to create high-quality images of proposed buildings but the extent to which these images are contributing to the quality of the final product remains questionable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In construction, new building projects are commonly visualized by using virtual 3D models of the planned buildings [19]. These can be combined with photographs of the existing environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In construction, new building projects are commonly visualized by using virtual 3D models of the planned buildings [19]. These can be combined with photographs of the existing environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the findings and previous research also suggests that photorealism, as an inherent quality of CG representations, may not be enough to ascertain the accuracy and credibility of CG representations [38], [39]. On the contrary, this attribute should be used with caution as a measure of credibility because a bona fide likeness might fail to bestow the beholder with the essential features of the design presented.…”
Section: The Nature Of Photorealismmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The procedure for creating AVRs is void of input from field observations, and thus, as several researchers have pointed out, do not sufficiently represent human visual perception ( Nicolaou, 2004 ; Tavenor, 2007 ). Moreover, others have argued that there is potential for the producers of AVRs to tweak the input so as to downplay the negative visual effects of a proposal ( Bosselmann, 1998 ; Carmona et al, 2010 ; Day, 2002 ). Part of an official program of view management, which is often imposed as part of Great Britain’s EIA regulations, the LVMF policy promotes the use of computerized view analysis technology in British official control.…”
Section: London’s Protected Vistas 1999–2012mentioning
confidence: 99%