2023
DOI: 10.1108/k-04-2023-0646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban tourism destination image: a bibliometric visualization review

Abstract: PurposeThis paper aims to systematically visualize the structure and trends from 2005 to 2021, which will help scholars gain a deeper appreciation for existing studies and grasp future research possibilities and directions.Design/methodology/approachThe approach is bibliometric, using VOSviewer and CiteSpace to analyze 765 journal articles and reviews from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases over the past 16 years.FindingsThere is considerable interest in urban tourism destination image (U-TDI), part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…“Glimma” ( 26 ) R package produced classical metric multidimensional scaling plots to compare sample variation. “Venndetail” ( 27 ) and “ggven” ( 28 ) R packages were used to compare reward- and region-specific DEGs that were significant (FDR < 0.25) with log2FC less than -0.75 or greater than 0.75. Heatmap representations of log2FC gene expression values were created using Prism 10 (GraphPad) and ordered sequentially based on the relevant significant specific DEG list (represented by *).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Glimma” ( 26 ) R package produced classical metric multidimensional scaling plots to compare sample variation. “Venndetail” ( 27 ) and “ggven” ( 28 ) R packages were used to compare reward- and region-specific DEGs that were significant (FDR < 0.25) with log2FC less than -0.75 or greater than 0.75. Heatmap representations of log2FC gene expression values were created using Prism 10 (GraphPad) and ordered sequentially based on the relevant significant specific DEG list (represented by *).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%