2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban sustainability assessment tools: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
73
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
73
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Facing future work and aiming to increase the usability of UPSUF, one of the potential directions of this work will be to add approved certifications into the integrated evaluation toolkit. However, these certifications sometimes present a series of limitations and need a comprehensive revision (see Kaur and Garg, 2019). There are already some sources in the literature that looked for a revised method, with the Comprehensive Assessment Method for Sustainable Urban Development (CAMSUD; Ali-Toudert et al, 2020) being one of the most attractive ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facing future work and aiming to increase the usability of UPSUF, one of the potential directions of this work will be to add approved certifications into the integrated evaluation toolkit. However, these certifications sometimes present a series of limitations and need a comprehensive revision (see Kaur and Garg, 2019). There are already some sources in the literature that looked for a revised method, with the Comprehensive Assessment Method for Sustainable Urban Development (CAMSUD; Ali-Toudert et al, 2020) being one of the most attractive ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Poland, the production of biofuels for many years has been based on raw materials of agricultural origin, such as rapeseed oil and corn [77][78][79]. The trend consisting of basing the market of biofuels on raw food materials has been observed also in the European Union, the USA and Brazil [82][83][84][85][86][87]. However, as it has been pointed out by the European Parliament, it is necessary to increase the pace of development of biofuels from raw non-food materials and popularize electromobility in road transport [81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, various green building rating systems have been developed worldwide, which form the basis of sustainable building evaluation and certification. The most commonly used systems are Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) [10], Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) [11] and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB) [12], which are the most frequently cited in Elsevier's Scopus database [13][14][15][16]. LEED [10] and BREEAM [11] are also the oldest [13,14], and DGNB [12] is the most frequently used in Europe [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeinal and Huber [21] provided a general review and comparison of DGNB, LEED, and BREEAM, while Schwartz and Raslan [22] made comparisons between LEED and BREEAM for newly built residential buildings. In some cases, rating systems can also cover sustainable urban planning, as discussed by AlQahtany et al [23] and Kaur and Garg [14], where the latter provided a comprehensive review of the most widely used green building rating systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%