Urban statecraft: The governance of transport infrastructures in African cities

Abstract

Through the lens of infrastructure governance, this article explores the configurations and operations of the urban state in sub-Saharan Africa. We deploy and extend the concept of ‘statecraft’, drawing on the recent scholarship within urban studies which explores city and municipal statecraft. Consolidating insights across several studies on transport governance in African cities, we identify three ‘sites’ of urban statecraft evident in urban Africa. First, we look at sectoral authorities, which we analyse through the common experience of ringfenced national road agencies. Carving off urban functions can fragment power over urban infrastructure. Second, we look at metropolitan authorities, which we analyse through bus rapid transit (BRT) agencies. Metropolitanisation crafts new scales of governance in Africa’s larger cities. Finally, we turn to the regulation of informal service delivery systems, which we analyse through popular transport regulation. The regulation of minibus and motorcycle taxis shows the central importance of everyday practice in urban statecraft in Africa. The case of transport governance provides a particularly vivid display of the institutional fragmentation that exists between state agencies and institutions in African cities. In this context, the urban state is not a static municipal entity, but is enacted through complex and multi-scalar relationships. These relationships relate not only to the assignment of functions or territorial design, but also to the practices which animate infrastructural systems. More generally, we argue that there is ample scope within the African urban governance debates for deeper interrogation of statecraft.

Plug-in urbanism: City building and the parodic guise of new infrastructure in Africa

“…This literature has examined recent spates of new intercity roads and railways (Goodfellow and Huang, 2021; Lesutis, 2022), highways, expressways and flyovers (Kimari, 2021; Mulwa, 2019), tram lines, light rail and dedicated bus lanes (Jacobsen, 2020; Wood, 2014), and related and complementary works (Enns and Bersaglio, 2020). In this literature, transport systems and networks are cast as domains that are animated by complex governance relationships and socio-economic concerns (Cirolia and Harber, 2022; Kimari, 2021), developmentalist aspirations, corporatist fantasies, colonialist legacies (Enns and Bersaglio, 2020; Lesutis, 2022) and new territorial and geopolitical trends of urbanisation (Wiig and Silver, 2019). These processes reflect ongoing infrastructure-led development in Africa where centralised forces at global, national and municipal scales accentuate the region’s ‘re-enchantment with big infrastructure’ (Enns and Bersaglio, 2020; Nugent, 2018) or what Kanai and Schindler (2019) have referred to as an ‘infrastructure scramble’.…”

Financial geography I: The state-finance nexus

“…In the UK, the 'private finance initiative' was introduced by the government, which uses the private sector to finance, build, and operate services and infrastructure previously provided by the government, through long-term contractual arrangements. Over the past three decades, similar contractual arrangements broadly termed 'publicprivate partnerships' have become common between governments and private partners in various countries (Anguelov, 2022;Birch and Siemiatycki, 2016;Cirolia and Harber, 2022;Pike et al, 2019). Different national and local politics shape the degrees and configurations in which expenditures and revenues have been devolved to local governments, varying across geographical contexts such as Australia, Canada, Finland, Germany, and the UK (Slack, 2017).…”

Post-conflict statecraft, land governance and exclusion in Hargeisa, Somaliland

“…Cirolia and Harber, for instance, provide crucial insight into the material and political processes that condition the governance of urban infrastructures not only as critical connectors of people and places but also as an arena of the state's image construction, deconstruction and reconstruction. (33) Kroll and Adelle explore emergency statecraft to understand "how distributional politics shape resilience unevenly and what this means for the systemic transformation of power" configurations in urban spaces. (34) They examine the networks and regulatory instruments created to safeguard food systems, improve preparedness for future disturbances and provide opportunities for a transition to more sustainable urban liveability.…”