Urban social vulnerability assessment with physical proxies and spatial metrics derived from air- and spaceborne imagery and GIS data

Abstract

Risk management in urban planning is of increasing importance to mitigate the growing amount of damage and the increasing number of casualties caused by natural disasters. Risk assessment to support management requires knowledge about present and future hazards, elements at risk and different types of vulnerability. This article deals with the assessment of social vulnerability (SV). In the past this has frequently been neglected due to lack of data and assessment difficulties. Existing approaches for SV assessment, primarily based on community-based methods or on census data, have limited efficiency and transferability. In this article a new method based on contextual analysis of image and GIS data is presented. An approach based on proxy variables that were derived from highresolution optical and laser scanning data was applied, in combination with elevation information and existing hazard data. Object-oriented image analysis was applied for the definition and estimation of those variables, focusing on SV indicators with physical characteristics. A reference Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) was created from census data available for the study area on a neighbourhood level and tested for parts of Tegucigalpa, Honduras. For the evaluation of the proxy-variables, a stepwise regression model to select the best explanatory variables for changes in the SVI was applied. Eight out of 47 variables explained almost 60% of the variance, whereby the slope position and the proportion of built-up area in a neighbourhood were found to be the most valuable proxies. This work shows that contextual segmentation-based analysis of geospatial data can substantially aid in SV assessment and, when combined with field-based information, leads to optimization in terms of assessment frequency and cost.

One step back for a leap forward: toward operational measurements of elements at risk

“…Therefore, the availability of new sensor systemsdelivering very high spatial resolution imagery-enabled an appreciable share of remote sensing first (Geiß and Taubenböck 2013). Notably, related studies aimed at an integrative view and considered numerous parameters for a holistic characterization and assessment of vulnerability (e.g., Taubenböck et al 2008;Ebert et al 2009;Prasad et al 2009;Taubenböck et al 2009a;Zeng et al 2012). Therefore, the derivation of a wide variety of vulnerability-related parameters from remote sensing comprising for example population (e.g., Dobson et al 2000;Taubenböck et al 2007;Chen 2002;Aubrecht et al 2012), and properties of the built environment (e.g., Mueller et al 2006;French and Muthukumar 2006;Sahar et al 2010), among others, was explored.…”

Stochastic landslide vulnerability modeling in space and time in a part of the northern Himalayas, India

“…Remote-sensing-based mapping and data collection has been an additional step forward, in particular for areas that are difficult to access. As a result, remotely sensed data has been widely used to extract various elements at risk (Ebert et al 2009;Shamaoma 2005).…”

Spatial Analysis in Public Health Domain: An NLP Approach

“…Maxwell's works in this context highlights that spatial fidelity as well as improved accuracy makes object based approaches preferable. Literature reveals that performance of both the approaches is situation specific and needs to be integrated for an effective analysis (Addink et al 2009;Ebert et al 2011;Blaschke, Hay 2011;Kelly et al 2004). Resolution of imagery as 150…”