2006
DOI: 10.1029/2006gl026283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban shakemap methodology for Bucharest

Abstract: [1] We develop a methodology for a shakemap for the Romanian capital Bucharest that can be rapidly computed and delivered to the public, once real-time data access is available to a sufficient extent. The methodology, with which the Californian shakemaps are generated, cannot be transferred to Bucharest, due to a missing understanding of the relationship between the geological near-surface structure and the ground motion amplification. However, a systematic incorporation of previous seismological observations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such scenarios are used to reliably adjust building codes and city planning. Currently such estimations are done for Bucharest by extrapolating actual measurements of past seismic motions (Bartlakowski et al 2006), or by modelling the seismic ground motion from the known underground structure and expected source characteristics (Miksat 2006), or even a combination of both. Consequently, the precise knowledge of the underground structure is an essential component of seismic hazard assessment, especially in the presence of a soft sedimentary cover that can generate severe site effects with amplification of wave amplitudes (Lungu et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such scenarios are used to reliably adjust building codes and city planning. Currently such estimations are done for Bucharest by extrapolating actual measurements of past seismic motions (Bartlakowski et al 2006), or by modelling the seismic ground motion from the known underground structure and expected source characteristics (Miksat 2006), or even a combination of both. Consequently, the precise knowledge of the underground structure is an essential component of seismic hazard assessment, especially in the presence of a soft sedimentary cover that can generate severe site effects with amplification of wave amplitudes (Lungu et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent strong motion studies, conducted to determine the peak ground acceleration (PGA) for risk assessment, revealed a strong spatial and frequency-dependent variability of PGA across the city (e.g. Wirth et al 2003;Aldea et al 2004;Cioflan et al 2004;Bartlakowski et al 2006) as well as a dependence on the absolute seismic amplitude (Mândrescu et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%