Urban-rural inequality regarding drug prescriptions in primary care facilities – a pre-post comparison of the National Essential Medicines Scheme of China

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of the National Essential Medicines Scheme (NEMS) with respect to urban-rural inequalities regarding drug prescriptions in primary care facilities.MethodsA stratified two-stage random sampling strategy was used to sample 23,040 prescriptions from 192 primary care facilities from 2009 to 2010. Difference-in-Difference (DID) analyses were performed to test the association between NEMS and urban-rural gaps in prescription patterns. Between-Group Variance and Theil Index were calculated to measure urban-rural absolute and relative disparities in drug prescriptions.ResultsThe use of the Essential Medicines List (EML) achieved a compliance rate of up to 90 % in both urban and rural facilities. An overall reduction of average prescription cost improved economic access to drugs for patients in both areas. However, we observed an increased urban-rural disparity in average expenditure per prescription. The rate of antibiotics and glucocorticoids prescription remained high, despite a reduced disparity between urban and rural facilities. The average incidence of antibiotic prescription increased slightly in urban facilities (62 to 63 %) and reduced in rural facilities (67 % to 66 %). The urban-rural disparity in the use of parenteral administration (injections and infusions) increased, albeit at a high level in both areas (44 %-52 %).ConclusionNEMS interventions are effective in reducing the overall average prescription costs. Despite the increased use of the EML, indicator performances with respect to rational drug prescribing and use remain poor and exceed the WHO/INRUD recommended cutoff values and worldwide benchmarks. There is an increased gap between urban and rural areas in the use of parenteral administration and expenditure per prescription.

Effects of the performance management information system in improving performance: an empirical study in Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital

“…With the deepening reform of healthcare system in China, controlling the proportion of drug cost accounting for total medical expenditure has become a significant objective and great challenge for public hospitals (Liang et al 2014 ; Yao et al 2015b ; Song et al 2014 ; Yang et al 2013 ). Curtailing the drug cost proportion is beneficial to guide the rational medication and control the unreasonable increase of drug expenditure (World Health Organization 2002 ; Quick et al 1991 ; Guan et al 2011 ; Le Grand et al 1999 ).…”

China's Health Reform Update

“…Implementation of the EDL reduced medication prices, especially for proprietary brands, and reduced drug expenditures per visit (8,19,78,80,90,93). In a quasi-experimental survey analysis of 55,800 prescriptions in primary care facilities in Hubei province, implementation of the EDL decreased the average cost per prescription [from 26.67 RMB to 44.67 RMB ($4.13-$6.93)] but did not reduce either prescription of antibiotics or parenteral drug delivery (79).…”

Sino-Australian University Partnership in Health Management Education

“…This is evidenced by 11 monographs/textbooks and an impressive 173 peer-reviewed publications produced by the CHP staff about the Chinese health system and health reforms published in both English and the Chinese language. Topics have included patient satisfaction (29)(30)(31), medications policy and practice (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40), patient safety and organizational safety culture (41,42), health reform (35,(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50), health insurance (50)(51)(52), emergency response (53)(54)(55)(56), and human resource management (3).…”