Urban–rural differences in the associations between social deprivation and psychiatric service utilization in schizophrenia and all diagnoses: a case-register study in Northern Italy

Abstract

SynopsisService utilization measures from the psychiatric case registers for urban South-Verona and rural Portogruaro in North East Italy for the period 1983–9 were used to identify associations with socio-demographic variables from the 1981 census in schizophrenia and related disorders as well as in all diagnoses. The patterns of service use were broadly similar, except that Portogruaro has significantly more community contacts, and has about twice the treated incidence and prevalence of schizophrenia. The census data showed that unmarried and unemployed people were more likely to live alone in the urban than in the rural area. In South-Verona the most strongly associated predictor variables, both for schizophrenia and all diagnoses, are: living alone, unemployment, percentage of the total population who are dependents and the percentage who are divorced, separated or widowed. In contrast, in Portogruaro there were no consistent associations between census and service use variables. Stepwise multiple regression models using three census predictor variables accounted for over 85% of the variance in South-Verona utilization rates. The results indicate that the strongly predictive associations previously described in England hold in urban South-Verona, but not in rural Portogruaro, and may be related to the effect of cities in clustering seriously disabled psychiatric patients in areas of low-cost housing where they live in relative social isolation.

Individual and contextual effects on mental health status in São Paulo, Brazil

“…31,32 Their aim, however, was to investigate the possibility of an ecological effect of neighborhood and treated incidence of mental disorders in Maastricht, Netherlands. Using quantitative data and a multilevel modeling approach, they found evidence for an ecological effect on the treated incidence of non-psychotic disorders even after controlling for individuallevel factors.…”

Urban–rural differences in psychiatric rehabilitation outcomes

“…Thornicroft et al wrote about the effect of cities in clustering seriously disabled psychiatric patients in areas of low-cost housing where they lived in relative social isolation. 4 Social migration theories alone are not sufficient to explain the urban-rural differences. 5 Rural communities have socioeconomic and cultural characteristics that are distinct from non-rural communities.…”

The Nordic Comparative Study on Sectorized Psychiatry: Professional ideology and realities among staff

“…The perception of psychiatric services as an oppressing agent is also more common outside city centres. In metropolitan areas social problems, drug abuse, and social disintegration generally are more frequent among psychiatric patients (11,12), at least patients with a psychosis diagnosis (13). This might explain the staffs' attitudes in favour of an integration of psychiatry and other services in the social field, rather than a delineation and establishment of formal referral procedures for access to services.…”