The humanitarian system and people living with and in long-term refugee situations envisage the future differently. In this article, I explore different notions of the future that may be found in humanitarian policies and among humanitarian workers. With particular reference to understandings of emergency, crisis and ethics in humanitarianism, I discuss ways in which the future is understood and practiced by humanitarian actors working in situations of protracted displacement. Analysing the policy context for Syrian refugees in Jordan in the context of the 'humanitarian reason' which tends to separate between biological and biographical lives, I identify how the future and past are separated from the present in a process that decontextualizes forced migrants both temporally and spatially. I show how humanitarian work is bound by its temporariness: it is relief and life saving. In most cases, however, humanitarian operations last much longer than anticipated. When humanitarian workers become embedded in the local context and come to know the people they assist, they feel responsibility for a shared future and may challenge -through their practices -the humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence. Thus, through focusing on what humanitarian workers do, we may be able to identify practices that challenge currently accepted humanitarian ethics. By way of conclusion, and supported by feminist discussions of temporality and the ethics of care, I suggest some possible ways of integrating a concept of the future into humanitarianism.
Syrian refugees in Jordan
Acknowledgements:This text was first presented at the workshop "Precarious Futures? Hoping, moving and waiting in times of uncertainty" in September 2016. Nauja Kleist, Dorte Thorsen and Ida Vammen deserve a big thank you for organising an inspiring and constructive workshop at the most beautiful place in Tisvildeleje in Denmark. Many thanks to Nauja Kleist and Stef Jansen for providing the opportunity to develop the paper for this special issue, to the reviewers for their comments, and to my co-contributors for providing insightful
Ingress: Stuck in the present?"Being stuck" is a spatio-temporal notion that implies that the future aspired to cannot be reached, that an undesirable situation or location cannot be escaped. It indicates temporal, social and geographical stillness. I have tried several times to use the title "stuck in the present" when writing to understand the situation in which people in protracted displacement find themselves. But every time I work on the expression of "being stuck", it becomes clear that the people, whose experiences and practices I am writing about, are not entirely stuck. The term does not quite work. We need to respect that people in protracted displacement often feel stuck: they are stuck in a status of being displaced or stuck in a war zone without the ability to escape, they feel stuck because they cannot develop their lives, stuck because they cannot control their future and because the future they of...