2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11769-018-0934-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Plant Diversity in Relation to Land Use Types in Built-up Areas of Beijing

Abstract: Urban plants provide various ecosystem services and biodiversity for human well-being. It is necessary to examine the plant species and functional traits composition and the influencing factors. In this study, a field survey was conducted using the tessellation-randomized plot method to assess the plant species and functional traits variability in greenspaces across eight land use types (LUTs) in the built-up areas of Beijing, China. Results showed that the woody plants in the built-up areas of Beijing compris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research of ruderals in Beijing’s built-up areas was based on the tessellation–randomized plot method [19,27]. The eight primary LUTs were defined as institutional, residential, commercial, community park, municipal park, woodlot, roadside, and riverside.…”
Section: Study Site and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research of ruderals in Beijing’s built-up areas was based on the tessellation–randomized plot method [19,27]. The eight primary LUTs were defined as institutional, residential, commercial, community park, municipal park, woodlot, roadside, and riverside.…”
Section: Study Site and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 12 neighborhoods, we recorded 218 species (Appendix A Table A1) belonging to 153 genera and 68 families. The most common plant species belonged to Rosaceae (including 27 species), followed by Asteraceae (24), Oleaceae (11), and Poaceae (10). The genera with the highest number of species were Prunus, followed by Populus, Malus, and Viola.…”
Section: Differences In Plant Diversity Between Neighborhoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant diversity as a fundamental element of green spaces determines the ecosystem functions and services that can be derived directly by residents. Green spaces in neighborhoods host a substantial level of plant diversity, especially for the native species that contributed 52.4% of the total number of tree species of neighborhoods in Beijing, China [9,10]. In addition, green spaces in neighborhoods often have a higher percentage of native species than those in other land-use types, such as roadsides, institutional areas, community parks, and commercial areas [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We selected Chinese pine (Pinus tabuliformis Carr.) for this study because: (1) it is a native species of China and has been planted for a 100 years in Beijing, China; (2) it is one of the top five evergreen tree species in Beijing in terms of number of individuals and ecological importance, such as forest regeneration, carbon storage, and aesthetic value (Wang et al, 2014); (3) it is distributed widely across various land-use types along the urban-rural gradient in Beijing, China (Zhao, 2010;Guo et al, 2018); and (4) its leaf traits have been widely studied and show significant variations (Wang et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2016). We selected eight leaf functional traits-five morphological traits: stomatal density, leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, and specific leaf area (SLA); and three physiological traits: leaf nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) concentrations-based on three considerations: (1) They play key roles in plant adaptation to environmental changes that accompany urban-rural gradients (Woodward and Kelly, 1995;Reich and Oleksyn, 2004;Wright et al, 2004;Barwise and Kumar, 2020); (2) they are related closely to plant resource utilization strategies, growth, and production (Wright et al, 2004;Garnier and Navas, 2012); and (3) they are simple to measure (Cornelissen et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%