Urban Land Use and Land Cover Change Analysis Using Random Forest Classification of Landsat Time Series

Abstract

Efficient implementation of remote sensing image classification can facilitate the extraction of spatiotemporal information for land use and land cover (LULC) classification. Mapping LULC change can pave the way to investigate the impacts of different socioeconomic and environmental factors on the Earth’s surface. This study presents an algorithm that uses Landsat time-series data to analyze LULC change. We applied the Random Forest (RF) classifier, a robust classification method, in the Google Earth Engine (GEE) using imagery from Landsat 5, 7, and 8 as inputs for the 1985 to 2019 period. We also explored the performance of the pan-sharpening algorithm on Landsat bands besides the impact of different image compositions to produce a high-quality LULC map. We used a statistical pan-sharpening algorithm to increase multispectral Landsat bands’ (Landsat 7–9) spatial resolution from 30 m to 15 m. In addition, we checked the impact of different image compositions based on several spectral indices and other auxiliary data such as digital elevation model (DEM) and land surface temperature (LST) on final classification accuracy based on several spectral indices and other auxiliary data on final classification accuracy. We compared the classification result of our proposed method and the Copernicus Global Land Cover Layers (CGLCL) map to verify the algorithm. The results show that: (1) Using pan-sharpened top-of-atmosphere (TOA) Landsat products can produce more accurate results for classification instead of using surface reflectance (SR) alone; (2) LST and DEM are essential features in classification, and using them can increase final accuracy; (3) the proposed algorithm produced higher accuracy (94.438% overall accuracy (OA), 0.93 for Kappa, and 0.93 for F1-score) than CGLCL map (84.4% OA, 0.79 for Kappa, and 0.50 for F1-score) in 2019; (4) the total agreement between the classification results and the test data exceeds 90% (93.37–97.6%), 0.9 (0.91–0.96), and 0.85 (0.86–0.95) for OA, Kappa values, and F1-score, respectively, which is acceptable in both overall and Kappa accuracy. Moreover, we provide a code repository that allows classifying Landsat 4, 5, 7, and 8 within GEE. This method can be quickly and easily applied to other regions of interest for LULC mapping.

Fusion of Multiple Models for Improving Gross Primary Production Estimation With Eddy Covariance Data Based on Machine Learning

“…It is an ensemble method, and contains a large number of small decision trees representing a distinct instance of the classification of data input into the random forest. RF algorithm was proposed by Breiman in 2001 and was widely applied in the fields of geographical science research because the algorithm is extremely robust, easy to get started with, good at heterogeneous data types, and has very few hyperparameters (Amini et al., 2022; Gyamerah, 2020; Meng, 2021). R package randomForest (Liaw & Wiener, 2002) gave the interface to bring individual model GPP into the process of putting the input vector down each of the trees in the forest, and ultimately output the merged value.…”

Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Healthcare Facilities in Isfahan Metropolitan Area in Iran

“…The city includes 15 districts and 200 neighbourhoods (Figure 1). In the last century, Isfahan has experienced the rapid and scattered development of the urban surface (Amini et al, 2022;Alimohammadi et al, 2004;. Figure 2.…”

How Landsat 9 Is Superior to Landsat 8: Comparative Assessment of Land Use Land Cover Classification and Land Surface Temperature

“…This growing trend in the population has been leading to demand augmentation for housing, transportation, water, healthcare, food, and energy. To meet these requirements, people have utilized natural resources and caused changes in the Earth's surface (Amini et al, 2022). Thus, generating Land Use Land Cover (LULC) Maps has always been more of an issue for land management, land planning, and sustainable environment ( Thiam et al, 2022;Sekertekin et al, 2017).…”