Urban Land and Housing Markets in the Punjab, Pakistan

Abstract

Well-functioning urban land and housing markets are critical success factors for achieving robust economic growth. This paper provides an overview of urban land and housing market performance in Punjab Province of Pakistan. It describes the characteristics of well-functioning markets and argues that the Punjab’s present markets are not performing adequately. In fact, there exists a range of impediments to efficient urban land and housing market performance: excessive public land ownership, inadequate infrastructure services, weak property rights, pervasive public- and private-sector rent seeking, counter-productive urban planning policies and regulations, costly sub-division and construction regulations, limited financing for property development and acquisition, rent controls and inadequate property-tax-based revenue-generating mechanisms. The paper concludes by suggesting that a prioritised comprehensive reform agenda is needed to improve urban land and housing market performance in Punjab Province. The analytical and conceptual approach used to research this paper is based on standard neo-classical economics. Therefore, the paper does not address broader political economy or structural issues. Consequently, the paper’s contribution should be viewed as limited in scope.

Scenario-Based Simulation on Dynamics of Land-Use-Land-Cover Change in Punjab Province, Pakistan

“…Furthermore, it has the strongest economy [50] and hosts more than half of the country's population, driving rapid urbanization and agriculture [51]. Punjab is the land of five rivers, namely Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Sutlej that are the tributaries of the Indus River.…”

Rapid Urbanization: Problems and Challenges for Adequate Housing in Pakistan

“…There are a range of factors, working independently and interdependently, to stifle urban land and housing markets and forcing poor people to live in unsuitable living conditions. The supply of serviced land is constrained by: widespread public ownership of land, inadequate trunk infrastructure provision to developable sites, inappropriate and inefficient land use plans, poor registration systems and distorting taxes (Dowall & Ellis, 2007). These all factors make land so expensive and unaffordable by low-income group making dream of good living as unachievable.…”

Housing supply and urban planning reform: the recent Australian experience, 2003–2012

“…However, there are potential concerns about the market impacts of land supply policies designed to manage the environmental impact of development; and perceived transaction costs associated with government intervention (Webster, 1998). Much of the empirical research in the field has been undertaken in the US and the UK (for example, see Bramley, 1998Bramley, , 2013Glaeser & Ward, 2009;Gyourko, Saiz, & Summers, 2008;White & Allmendinger, 2003), although there is an emerging body of contributions from other nations characterized by different systems of urban governance and housing provision, including Hong Kong (Hui & Ho, 2003), South Asia (Dowall & Ellis, 2009), Africa (Egbu, Omolaiye, & Gameson, 2007), and Europe (Altes, 2009). These diverse studies highlight the need to consider contextual differences in housing markets and land use regulation, both in examining relationships between planning and housing, and in transferring findings.…”