Urban Influence on Costs of Production in the Corn Belt

Abstract

This article determines the relative technical efficiency of rural- and urban-influenced crop/livestock enterprises in the Corn Belt. Farmers in urban-influenced locations are less technically efficient than farmers in rural locations. During 1998–2000, stochastic production frontier procedures indicate that a 10% increase in urban influence leads to a close to 4% decrease in technical efficiency. The most successful urban-influenced farms have controlled costs as effectively as rural farms. They have tended to de-emphasize that nondairy livestock activities—particularly beef and hogs—do not rely extensively on off-farm income, and have relatively large, less residential/lifestyle operations compared to less successful urban-influenced farmers. However, our statistical analysis clearly bears out the refrain in popular literature that urban proximity raises the cost for, and decreases the viability of, traditional farms. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

Does Urban Proximity Enhance Technical Efficiency? Evidence From Chinese Agriculture

“…It is interesting to note that our conclusion differs from that of Nehring et al. () according to which urban proximity negatively affects farmers' technical efficiency level in the U.S. However, their study is carried out on a sample of farmers in the Corn Belt, the production context of which is very different from the Chinese context.…”

Notice of Retraction: Cost Comparison and Control Based on GLM and Panel Data Model: Evidence from Major Citrus Producing Areas in China

“…Richard Nehring, Charles Barnard and David Banke (2006) considered that the interspersion of agricultural and urban-related activities raises the cost of producing agricultural commodities in urban-influenced areas [4]. Difference in factors price, scale economy, technical level and others can cause difference in regional cost.…”

Analyzing determinants of forest owners’ decision-making using a sample selection framework

“…Goodwin and Mishra, 2004;Lien et al, 2006;Nehring et al, 2006) each observation is imposed a replication weight. Hundred and forty-four strata were defined as each of the 18 counties was divided into 8 area classes.…”