The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.5820/aian.1701.2010.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Indian Voices: A Community-Based Participatory Research Health and Needs Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Community-based approaches to research with AI/AN populations, whether urban or rural, have proven especially effective [63, 64]. In this approach, research questions are formulated by a partnership that includes community members as well as academic researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community-based approaches to research with AI/AN populations, whether urban or rural, have proven especially effective [63, 64]. In this approach, research questions are formulated by a partnership that includes community members as well as academic researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under such a model, used previously with good success in the United States among both Black female poultry processors and urban Indian Americans, employees or local community members are 56 involved in data collection from peers (Lipscomb, Argue, McDonald, Dement, Epling, James, et. al., 2005;Johnson, Bartgis, Worley, Hellman, & Burkhart, (2010).…”
Section: Opportunities For Future Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted above, over half of the studies with Indigenous Peoples reported using collaborative design processes (e.g., Allen et al, ; Bainbridge et al, ; Brown et al, ; Smylie, Kaplan‐Myrth, & McShane, ). Besides forming advisory groups, collaborative study design with Indigenous Peoples or Nations often involved meetings with Elders (e.g., Isaak et al, ; Johnson, Bartgis, Worley, Hellman, & Burkhart, ; Jumper‐Reeves, Dustman, Harthun, Kulis, & Brown, ; Potv et al, ), establishing open and iterative processes of discussions among researchers and community participants (e.g., formal and informal Nation leadership, and general community members), and working with language interpreters or cultural advisors to identify key areas of research interest and best practices for collecting and using information. Collaborative design processes were also identified as being useful for selecting appropriate underpinning theoretical research frames (Allen et al, ; Allen & Mohatt, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%