Urban Inclusiveness and Income Inequality in China

Qiu, Leiju; Zhao, Daxuan

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3035574

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…That is the reason why urbanisation growth has led to increased income inequality. These result also following the results of Qiu and Zhao (2019) and Sulemana et al (2019). Also, we found the positive effect of urbanisation shock on the population.…”

Section: Source: Own Compilationsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…A study conducted by Sulemana et al (2019) found evidence of a positive relationship between urbanisation growth and income inequality in the region. According to Qiu and Zhao (2019), income inequality is higher in exclusive cities because skilled workers are relatively rare in exclusive cities that can enjoy higher skill premiums. Then, the urban population growth decreases with increasing human development, so urban growth reduces population growth because urban communities prefer to improve the quality of children rather than the number of children as in rural communities.…”

Section: Figure 1 the Relationship Between Income Inequality And Social Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of the relationship between income inequality and social variables: Evidence from Indonesia

Taresh¹,

Sari²,

Purwono³

2021

Economics &Amp; Sociology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Source: Own Compilationsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Figure 1 the Relationship Between Income Inequality And Social Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the relationship between income inequality and social variables: Evidence from Indonesia

Taresh¹,

Sari²,

Purwono³

2021

Economics &Amp; Sociology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…And also as found by Cysne and Turchick (2012) that an increase in unemployment increases income inequality. And the results run with the results of Sulemana, Nketiah-Amponsah et al (2019)and Qiu and Zhao (2019) who found that urbanization exacerbated income inequality. Also to be in accordance with Pickett and Wilkinson (2015) and Detollenaere, Desmarest et al (2018) who found that poor health and the spread of disease increase income inequality.…”

Section: Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Issn 1411-6081 E-issn 2460-9331 152mentioning

confidence: 51%

Joint Determinants of Monetary, Macroeconomic, Social and Income Inequality

Taresh

Sari

Purwono

2020

JEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study discusses all the potential relationships between monetary, macroeconomic, social and income inequality in an integrated manner by making Indonesia a concrete case study. This empirical study discussed the relationship based on theoretical modelling and carried out through appropriate estimators applied to the data of 33 provinces in Indonesia. To achieve this objective, the simultaneous model of seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR) was used. The results concluded that there are variables that jointly determined the monetary, macroeconomic and social also income inequality. Like, consumption can increase inflation and macroeconomic while at the same time can reduce population growth and human development, and increases income inequality. Savings which determine credit also pushes macroeconomics while simultaneously increasing population growth, and it can reduce income inequality. Minimum wages can reduce inflation and encourage production growth, while increases human development and reduces population growth also can reduce income inequality. Unemployment can also reduce inflation and increase economic growth, at the same time reduces population growth and human development while increases income inequality. Education and health encourages economic growth and the level of human development then can reduce income inequality.

show abstract

“…Of course, the per capita annual disposable income of residents in China is approximately 21,966yuan (equivalent to 3,527US$) in 2015, which is indeed lower than in most developed countries [74]. Nonetheless, individuals in all countries tend to assess their own incomes relative to those of their peers, which, given the dramatic increase in income disparity at various levels, could be contributing to the relatively low income satisfaction [75].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why are Chinese workers so unhappy? A comparative cross-national analysis of job satisfaction, job expectations, and job attributes

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using data from the 2015 International Social Survey Program (ISSP), this study conducts a multinational comparison of job satisfaction determinants and their drivers in 36 countries and regions, with particular attention to the reasons for relatively low job satisfaction among Chinese workers. Based on our results from a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis, we attribute a substantial portion of the job satisfaction differences between China and the other countries to different job attributes and expectations; in particular, to unmet job expectations for interesting work, high pay, and opportunities for advancement. We also note that, contrary to common belief, Chinese workers value similar attributes as Western workers but perceive their work conditions as very different from those in the West.

show abstract

Urban Inclusiveness and Income Inequality in China

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Analysis of the relationship between income inequality and social variables: Evidence from Indonesia

Analysis of the relationship between income inequality and social variables: Evidence from Indonesia

Joint Determinants of Monetary, Macroeconomic, Social and Income Inequality

Why are Chinese workers so unhappy? A comparative cross-national analysis of job satisfaction, job expectations, and job attributes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About