2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban governance and big corporations in the digital economy: An investigation of socio-spatial implications of Google Fiber in Kansas City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alizadeh et al (2017) describes city management and large corporations in the digital economy based on studying sociospatial consequences of using Google Fiber in Kansas City. Guo et al (2017) point out the significant role of global management based on G20 in the forming digital economy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alizadeh et al (2017) describes city management and large corporations in the digital economy based on studying sociospatial consequences of using Google Fiber in Kansas City. Guo et al (2017) point out the significant role of global management based on G20 in the forming digital economy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, in many communities, acquiring broadband can be more difficult for residents who cannot speak English (e.g. Hispanic communities), who are not participants in the traditional banking system, and do not have a credit or debit card to pre-register and make the required deposit to start broadband services [ 70 ]. These underlying structural inequalities can make breastfeeding support, and success, more difficult to achieve in areas that are already struggling for a host of other reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digital divide is particularly acute between urban/suburban and rural/remote areas [66][67][68]. Specifically, urban residents can often choose from several providers and platforms (e.g., cable, fiber), enjoy higher quality of service [69] and benefit from the latest technological upgrades [70]. If broadband is available in a rural or remote area, subscribers often suffer from monopolistic or duopolistic broadband markets [71]-experiencing higher costs, lower quality of service and slow (or non-existent) technology upgrade cycles [72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Telelactation and The Digital Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Represented in these maps is the assumption that many people will be using the Internet but also that Internet connection is a specialized service for specific populations-supply and access is robust but not ubiquitous or evenly distributed. This imagined use coincides with the practice of "cream-skimming" among telecommunications providerswhere infrastructure is installed in areas with the largest return on investment (Alizadeh et al, 2017). Unfortunately, this practice leads to the formation of "urban islands of inequity" that disadvantage lower income neighborhoods and communities of color (Grubesic, 2006).…”
Section: Dark Fiber As Invisible Excessmentioning
confidence: 94%