Urban-fringe afforestation projects and taxable hedonic values

Revealing preferences of Prague's homebuyers toward greenery amenities: The empirical evidence of distance–size effect

“…Most of the studies concentrate on the effects of large areas -urban parks, forests and greenbelts (Anthon, Thorsen, & Helles, 2004;Asabere & Huffman, 2007). Other studies pay specific attention to the inclusion of protected areas into the model in contrast to ordinary urban vegetation.…”

Landowners’ perspectives on the rural future and the role of forests across Europe

“…Research findings have emphasised that non-production forest services, such as providing an attractive living environment, have a positive economic impact on local areas (Tyrvainen and Miettinen, 2000;Praestholm et al, 2002;Anthon et al, 2005). Slee (2006) has proposed a multi-method approach for evaluating the role of forests in rural development, and preliminary studies illustrate that the economic importance of the so-called ''shadow values'' exceed those of primary production.…”

Contribution of afforestation subsidies policy to climate change adaptation in the Czech Republic

“…Niskanen, 1999;Anthon et al, 2005;Mogas et al, 2005;Pahkasalo et al, 2005;Nájera et al, 2005Nájera et al, , 2007Moons and Rousseau, 2007;Clinch, 2000;Jarský and Pulkrab, 2013), performance of incentives in, and barriers to, generating afforestation output (Selby and Petäjistö, 2000;Madsen, 2003;McCarthy et al, 2003;Kassioumis et al, 2004;Praestholm et al, 2006;Moons and Rousseau, 2007;Moons et al, 2008;van Gossum et al, 2008;Wynne-Jones, 2013;Duesberg et al, 2013Duesberg et al, , 2014aVedel et al, 2015), and environmental outcomes, including adverse impact of some subsidy schemes on local biodiversity (e.g. Plantinga and Wu, 2003;Díaz et al, 1998;Pedrini and Sergio, 2001) and afforestation schemes' role in creating carbon sinks (van Kooten et al, 1995;Cacho et al, 2003;Tassone et al, 2004;Ovando et al, 2010).…”