Urban dynamic in high spatiotemporal resolution: The case study of Porto

Jardim, Bruno; Neto, Miguel Sabino; Calçada, Paulo

doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104867

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The resolution given by the settlement of cases arising from press reporting through nonlitigation channels that are currently in force does not provide satisfaction for those who seek justice, this can be seen in Press Council Regulation Number 9 of 2008 concerning Guidelines for the Right to Answer, in the guidelines it is stated that the right to answer is carried out proportionally, which is contained in the same place once for each news and must be implemented within time immediately (Ariefulloh et al, 2023). However, in practice the interval between the first news and the loading of the right to answer is very long due to delays in service as occurs in some cases (Jardim et al, 2023). Because the affected person is generally the good name of a person who is due to the long interval, even though the right to answer has been proportionally loaded in accordance with applicable guidelines, the stigma against the…”

Section: Community Discontentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implications of Case Resolution Mechanism Due to Press Coverage through Non-Litigation Channels

Putra,

Rahayuningsih

2023

J. Progressive. Law. Leg. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today's news development in the media is very rapid, both traditional and electronic. Following technological developments, people can receive news from media worldwide directly through various means such as television, radio, newspapers, and even the Internet. Therefore, as a democratic country, Indonesia must be able to fulfill its obligation to guarantee press freedom and encourage the press to serve the interests of the public in seeking information. The national press appears increasingly free and unlimited in today's information technology era. For example, news considered harmful by a particular person or group can cause friction between the press and the public, giving rise to disputes over the behavior of press operators and news considered detrimental by certain groups. All disputes can be resolved through arbitration procedures stipulated in Law No. 40 of 1999 (from now on referred to as the Press Law) through mediation through non-judicial channels. However, not all disputes resolved in such a way can satisfy the parties and create legal certainty.

show abstract

Section: Community Discontentmentioning

confidence: 99%