Urban Development Revisited: The Role of Neighborhood Needs and Local Participation in Urban Revitalization

Abstract

Traditional models of economic development such as economic base and urban revitalization models have been found wanting. Both models rely on expert-based assessments of local development needs. More recent approaches call for a stronger focus on local development needs and resident skills as the basis for designing development strategies. One such neighborhood-based approach to development is presented in this paper. Its initial step was a survey of 444 households representing 1398 residents conducted in the Hamilton Hill and Vale neighborhoods of Schenectady, New York a 'downsized' community of about 65,000 residents in the Capital District of New York State. Survey results show a strong need for recreation, childcare, a grocery store, care for the elderly and home repairs. Residents' self-assessed job skills and interests appear to be well suited to meet these needs. Yet despite these promising results, barriers to neighborhood-based development persist. These barriers reiterate the long history of isolation prevalent in US inner city neighborhoods. Two issues are particularly characteristic of the barriers that continue to keep urban neighborhoods isolated from their larger context. They are: (1) a lack of effective communication between local residents and decision makers; and (2) a lack of valuation systems that properly assess the value of social and environmental context and their contributions to local development.Neighborhood-BASED Urban Development, Job Creation, Needs Assessment, Social Context,

Affordable, sustainable local economic research for small urban areas: 22 years of evolution and refinement

“…The project was originally conceived at the grassroots level based upon feedback from members of the Greater Johnstown/Cambria County Chamber of Commerce (GJ/CCCC). Many Chamber members are small businesses facing a tough postindustrial economy that is struggling with the out-migration of residents and jobs (O’Hara, 2001). One recurring theme the GJ/CCCC heard from its constituents was the need for localized market research information on projected future economic conditions.…”

Heterogeneity and scale of sustainable development in cities

“…To fill this gap, we must focus on how and where development takes place (11): inside cities and in terms of changes experienced by households and neighborhoods (12)(13)(14). Initial steps in this direction point to a large heterogeneity and inequality of outcomes between people or places, manifested by the unprecedented scale and growth of vast informal settlements (slums) in low-and middle-income cities (9,11,(15)(16)(17).…”

Analysis of the Sustainable Development Index in the Communes of the Podkarpackie Voivodeship: A Polish Case Study

“…The type and scope of these impacts differ and include air and water pollution, changes in land cover, loss of natural habitats, increased load on water resources, increased energy demand, and higher greenhouse gas emissions [62,63]. To determine the impact of spatial planning development on the sustainable development of the regional scale, one should focus on how and where this development takes place [64], not only within cities, but also in terms of the changes experienced by neighboring rural-urban and rural communes [65,66]. Local-scale analysis indicates changes towards more sustainable development, especially in combination with greater access to urban services [31,59,63,67] that enhance health and provide access to and cause a greater energy and water consumption, while having a significantly lower negative impact on the environment in terms of land use, polluted wastewater, or CO 2 emissions.…”