2008
DOI: 10.1080/17549170802529316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban development and climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Controlling for other factors, the difference in transport intensity between high-and low-density areas can be more than 40% in vehicle-miles-travelled per capita (Ewing, Bartholomew et al 2008). The National Research Council in the US estimates that doubling densities within metropolitan regions can reduce vehicle-kilometres-travelled (VKT) by up to 25 per cent when also concentrating employment (National Research Council 2009).…”
Section: Urban Accessibility Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Controlling for other factors, the difference in transport intensity between high-and low-density areas can be more than 40% in vehicle-miles-travelled per capita (Ewing, Bartholomew et al 2008). The National Research Council in the US estimates that doubling densities within metropolitan regions can reduce vehicle-kilometres-travelled (VKT) by up to 25 per cent when also concentrating employment (National Research Council 2009).…”
Section: Urban Accessibility Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scenario study for US metropolitan areas in cities such as Atlanta and Phoenix suggests a reduction of 7 to 10 per cent in carbon emissions as a result of a 20 to 40 per cent reduction in vehicle-miles-travelled due to compact urban development (Ewing, Bartholomew et al 2008). In the Indian city of Surat, estimates for annual carbon emissions resulting from a projected tenfold increase in the number of trips varies according to the mode choice and trip length -from 1.9 up to 9.5 million tonnes of CO 2 .…”
Section: Carbon Emissions From the Provision Of Access In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ignoring the implementation of complementary strategies (e.g. congestion pricing, increased transit use) or co-benefits, Ewing and colleagues 65 recently estimated that a change in land-use planning in the USA (from urban sprawl to compact development) could reduce vehicle miles travelled by 20-40% and transportation greenhouse emissions by 7-10% by 2050.…”
Section: Social Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, to have an impact, active transportation requires land-use planning and infrastructure investment that creates pedestrian and cycling-friendly communities. 62,65 Numerous studies now point to the importance of the built environment as a determinant of active transportation. 2,3 Moreover, studies have recently begun to demonstrate the effectiveness of infrastructure investments in changing behaviour, 62 and their cost effectiveness as a public health 66,67 or transport and health 68 intervention.…”
Section: Social Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colocating housing and jobs can allow people to live close to their workplace, thus reducing overall congestion, vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Cervero & Duncan, 2006;Ewing, Bartholomew, Winkelman, Walters, & Anderson, 2008). Ensuring an approximate balance of housing and jobs is also important for maintaining overall housing affordability, since an inadequate supply of housing in relation to jobs inevitably results in rising housing prices (Dowall, 1982;Gober, McHugh, & Leclerc, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%