Urban bioethics – The architect of a healthy city

Hubenko, Hanna

doi:10.21860/j.11.1.9

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…На онлайн-платформі InplatBio (Integrative Bioethics Platform) [Hubenko 2020] однією з головних ідей -висвітлити наукові, соціальні й політичні рішення/ставлення до етичних проблем у сучасному світі (це можуть бути етичні кодекси, біоетичні стандарти тощо), а також/або висвітлити нові гібридні професії/проєкти в раніше несумісних сферах 2 (мистецтв о+урбаністика+біоетика). Сприяння розвитку біоетичного потенціалу може також виконувати функції зв'язків з громадськістю, можна їх назвати -функцією маркетингу.…”

Section: висновки та перспективи дослідженняunclassified

Structuring Bioethics Education: Building Bioethical Potential, Experience, Practice

Hubenko¹

2021

Filos. osv. Philos. Educ.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is divided into the following main blocks: initiatives of bioethics` capacity building; practices and experiences in the bioethicist`s work. The article aims to investigate the structuring possibilities of bioethical education, and the model of integrative bioethics is seen in this context as a promising device/tool. The figure-scheme, created by the author, shows 2 bioethics' growth lines - educational, as a formal (institutional) line and societal, as informal (cultural) one. In describing the lines, the author has identified the main aspects of influence: the cultural aspect (a); the political aspect (c); the humanistic aspect / human capital (c). In the educational (formal) sphere the following areas of activity were described - school, education, interdisciplinary programs in bioethics. In societal (informal) - experience of participation of community organizations in the creation of projects and grant activities of bioethicists. Hereof the following blocks were discussed - Bioethicist as an activist; Role of bioethicist as a translator, agent of change. Education through bioethics and public discussion of bioethical issues is what can be called a «circle of integrity». Bioethics education prepares community members to deal with ethically challenging issues by providing them with the skills to address ethical challenges in the everyday routine of one community. Bioethics capacity building was reviewed through the creation of a professional network of bioethics experts and their educational programmes - the Integrative Platform of Bioethics (InPlatBio). A network of bioethicists and stakeholders provides a learning-friendly environment. Both - networks and the development of links with different informal organisations and associations are important for essential communicative skills. The use of online courses, webinars is a modern source of information on the development of bioethics in Ukraine as well as in European countries.

show abstract

Section: висновки та перспективи дослідженняunclassified

Structuring Bioethics Education: Building Bioethical Potential, Experience, Practice

Hubenko¹

2021

Filos. osv. Philos. Educ.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Interactive Cases of Bioethics and Public Health: By the Examples of Counteraction to Xenophobia, Discrimination and Inequality

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This article examines how bioethicists can make a significant contribution to mediation, public discourse, research, educating, learning, policy-making and academic impact in response to troubling and persistent models of xenophobia, racism and ‘pretentious’ prejudice. In order to make a meaningful contribution to these issues, bioethicists need training, awareness that they can play an important educational role in cooperation with other specialists and social spheres. Materials and Methods: An understanding of these issues from the perspective of bioethics is important in terms of the methodological approach that is used in its explanations. For example, in education, public health, etc. In the course of the research the bibliographic, bibliosemantic method, the method of system analysis. Conclusions: The main mechanism for combating xenophobia is the development of personal and social tolerance. Tolerance does not require an obligatory love to «our own»’ and to «others», but offers recognition of the real pluralism of cultures and ways of life, Professional training of/for bioethicists as partners/trainers who work together with the community to create solutions. Thus, as bioethicists, we create new educational and cultural programmes based on the knowledge gained through the integration of previous projects in various layers of society. They stimulate ethical and creative thinking, create conditions for team learning and encourage people in teams to find innovative ways of operating in contexts of high uncertainty and complexity of the 21st century. We therefore assume that bioethicists, as agents of change, are able to operate on various educational levels (starting from the primary level), contributing to increasing awareness and tolerance of one country’s population by communicating key bioethical messages. The purpose of bioethicists as educational tutors will be not only to understand the social and psychological sources of xenophobia and discrimination manifestations, but also to corroborate existing negative attitudes and stereotypes prevalent in the modern society.

show abstract

Urban bioethics – The architect of a healthy city

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Structuring Bioethics Education: Building Bioethical Potential, Experience, Practice

Structuring Bioethics Education: Building Bioethical Potential, Experience, Practice

Interactive Cases of Bioethics and Public Health: By the Examples of Counteraction to Xenophobia, Discrimination and Inequality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About