Urban and Spatial Planning: Pragmatic Considerations for Plan Implementation Improvements (A Case Study of the City of Bor)

Abstract

The main task of planning documents is to achieve maximal rationality in the use of space, spatial resources, and balanced territorial development. The preparation of plans is regulated by a legislative framework, which embraces multiple phases and stakeholders. In a perfect planning process, it would be expected that all the elements are well coordinated and brought to common understanding, but in reality, obstacles and challenges can occur in any of these steps, especially in the implementation phase. Although a plan is fully prepared to be practiced, its implementation might be omitted. Therefore, this article analyzes the full process of spatial and urban planning from the perspective of plan implementation. The methodology is based on a combination of different data collection methods (interviews, fieldwork, direct observation) with the analysis of plans and the particular mention of those plans that picture the implementation issues the most. Also, legislative acts and semi-annual and annual reports on the achievements of the local government budget are analyzed. The approach indicates that plan implementation depends the most on the willingness of the government to perform changes in the system and to peruse punitive policy comprehensively. Although it is about implementation at the local level, the success primarily depends on clear definitions given in the legislative acts, freedom of the local communities to make their own decisions, and financial decentralization, side by side with the regional and local circumstances, institutional technical and staff capacities, and application of participatory planning that involves actors from various sectors.

The European Green Capital Award—Is It a Dream or Reality for Belgrade (Serbia)?

“…Nevertheless, instead of directing energy towards green city policy development, changes in the thinking paradigm, and improvement of a participative approach that would inspire citizens to get involved in decision-making, the government of the City of Belgrade seems to have empowered high-handedness in decision-making, excluded citizens from the processes, and provoked them and professionals in urban development to engage against the city when it comes to projects that have an irreversible impact on the environment and cultural heritage (e.g., interfering with the recognizable city skyline by building multistorey buildings at the riverbanks, attempting to build a cable car infrastructure from the historical Kalemegdan Fortress to New Belgrade by cutting down 150 mature trees, etc.). High-handedness and lack of implementation of planning documents have been seen in other cities in the country, too [103].…”

Travel decision making through blogs and vlogs: An empirical investigation on how user-generated content influences destination image

“…Travel decision-making is a complex phenomenon (Nikolić et al, 2021). It is observed that the individual decision-making process for travelers differs based on travel motives, various decisions, context effects and social interactions among travel groups.…”