2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban advantage or Urban penalty? A case study of female-headed households in a South African city

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary reasons for female-headship have traditionally included male labour migration and non-marriage as stipulated by Posel (2001). However, Goebel, Dodson and Hill (2010) accentuated that although female headship in this context is connected to historically patterns of patriarchy and apartheid that are unique to South Africa; female headship increasingly is connected to contemporary macro-economic conditions. Gilbert, Seliko and Walker (2010) further suggest that premature death brought on by HIV and AIDS is a contributor too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary reasons for female-headship have traditionally included male labour migration and non-marriage as stipulated by Posel (2001). However, Goebel, Dodson and Hill (2010) accentuated that although female headship in this context is connected to historically patterns of patriarchy and apartheid that are unique to South Africa; female headship increasingly is connected to contemporary macro-economic conditions. Gilbert, Seliko and Walker (2010) further suggest that premature death brought on by HIV and AIDS is a contributor too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 This is congruent with the perspectives of urban planners and other urban scholars. 10 The complexity is framed as both positive and negative, 6,7,9 with scholars articulating both urban health advantages and penalties, [11][12][13][14][15] and ordered complexity 16 and disorder and chaos. 17 Scholars from a variety of disciplines have long conceptualized cities as systems.…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bien que relevant à l'origine d'une catégorie statistique, les femmes chefs de ménage sont souvent envisagées comme constituant un groupe social. Ce groupe doit alors être défini historiquement et géographiquement, car il ne saurait y avoir de conception universelle et définitive des ménages dirigés par une femme (Goebel, Dodson et Hill, 2010 ;Stewart-Withers, 2011).…”
Section: Représentations Du Statut De Femme Chef De Ménage Dans Le Counclassified
“…Elle dépend des mécanismes de prise en charge des systèmes de solidarité de la parenté élargie, mais aussi des croyances religieuses ou encore de la perception négative ou non des mères célibataires dans la société (StewartWithers, 2011). Selon les contextes, les ménages de veuves et de mères célibataires peuvent ne pas être dans des situations économiques ou sociales plus vulnérables que d'autres types de ménage (Debdulal et Rafi, 2010 ;Goebel, Dodson et Hill, 2010). Kebe et Charbit (2007) rapportent par exemple qu'au Sénégal, les chefs de ménage monoparentaux, majoritairement composés de femmes, sont les moins affectés par la pauvreté moné-taire.…”
Section: Ménage Dirigé Par Une Femme Et Féminisation De La Pauvreté Eunclassified