2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-016-5154-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uranium speciation and in situ leaching of a sandstone-type deposit from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sandstone uranium (U) deposits, accounting for approximately 18% of world U resources, are the important primary materials for the generation of nuclear power (Asghar et al., 2020). Uranium roll‐front deposits are found in sandstone‐type U deposits (Cumberland et al., 2016), and are characterized by high contents of carbonate and argillaceous substances, low permeability, low ore grade, and complex hydrogeological conditions (Q. Ma et al., 2017; Su et al., 2020; Yue et al., 2020, 2021). In situ leaching (ISL) is the main leaching method for sandstone‐type uranium ore (Abzalov, 2012; Mudd, 2001a, 2001b), mainly including acidic (Su et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020), neutral (Yang et al., 2022), and alkaline ISL (Abzalov, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sandstone uranium (U) deposits, accounting for approximately 18% of world U resources, are the important primary materials for the generation of nuclear power (Asghar et al., 2020). Uranium roll‐front deposits are found in sandstone‐type U deposits (Cumberland et al., 2016), and are characterized by high contents of carbonate and argillaceous substances, low permeability, low ore grade, and complex hydrogeological conditions (Q. Ma et al., 2017; Su et al., 2020; Yue et al., 2020, 2021). In situ leaching (ISL) is the main leaching method for sandstone‐type uranium ore (Abzalov, 2012; Mudd, 2001a, 2001b), mainly including acidic (Su et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020), neutral (Yang et al., 2022), and alkaline ISL (Abzalov, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…leachable uranium), and the suitability of ISL is assessed based on geological and hydrological conditions of the deposit and surrounding area. Permeability of the uranium sandstone ore is in the range of 0.09-1.6 m per day compared to the permeability of the surrounding clayformations, which is 0.01 m per day(Blaise, 2002;Ma et al, 2017). This method gives better leaching efficiencies (75-85%) and high uranium concentration in the pregnant solution (55-60 mg/L).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under near-neutral conditions, U forms soluble complexes with carbonate and phosphates. Ma et al [31] conducted an adsorption study of the U species and reported that these species are also influenced by the charge of the mineral surface, depending on the pH of the sorbate solution. Recently, Zhou et al [46] reported from ISL research from mining sites that, as the pH value decreases, the adsorbed UO 2 2+ can be replaced by protons and U concentration increases significantly in the leached solution.…”
Section: Effect Of Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that adsorption capacity continues to increase with the rise of initial U(VI) concentration, which may be due to the presence of more U(VI) ions around Fe [70]. Laboratory experiments focusing on U chemical species have been previously done as well for the purpose of researching in situ leaching of U ore, and have reported that the recovery of leaching U is decided jointly by both U content and its activity, according to Ma et al [31]. Probably, it seems that another mechanism may be due to the presence of different U(VI) initial concentrations in the solid phase, as it is negatively correlated with U 3 O 8 recovery (Figure 10).…”
Section: Effect Of U(vi) Initial Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation