2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uranium isotopes in Tunisian bottled mineral waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For uranium isotopes, the ranges of activities reported in Japanese bottled water in this study were 0.24–24 mBq/L and 0.13–26 mBq/L for 238 U and 234 U, respectively. Studies in Poland [ 16 ] reported a lower range in uranium activity concentrations, whereas Croatia [ 20 ] and Tunisia [ 18 ] reported similar activities. Studies in Italy [ 14 , 15 ] and Austria reported a broader range in their results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For uranium isotopes, the ranges of activities reported in Japanese bottled water in this study were 0.24–24 mBq/L and 0.13–26 mBq/L for 238 U and 234 U, respectively. Studies in Poland [ 16 ] reported a lower range in uranium activity concentrations, whereas Croatia [ 20 ] and Tunisia [ 18 ] reported similar activities. Studies in Italy [ 14 , 15 ] and Austria reported a broader range in their results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Shiraishi et al investigated the effective dose due to 232 Th and 238 U in imported mineral waters [ 6 ], and Shozugawa analysed four Japanese bottled waters for 134 Cs and 137 Cs following the FDNPP accident in 2011 [ 7 ]. However, no single study has attempted to analyse Japanese bottled waters for a comprehensive suite of radionuclides, although similar studies have been conducted in other countries for estimating the activity concentration and ingestion doses arising from the consumption of natural radionuclides in bottled water [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such the results have to be viewed with caution, not claiming to be a systematic representation of each brand throughout the year with its seasonal variations in source water solutes. Relevant assessments such as contamination by virus [30]; radiation load from radon and uranium [31,32]; toxic metals like lead, mercury and cadmium [33]; organic chemical hazards [34] and endocrine disrupting chemicals, in particular bisphenol A and phthalates (used in a range of consumer products) [35] is yet to be studied. The widespread use of ozone as disinfectant indicates a need to assess brominated compounds [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, internal radioactive exposure to the general public is directly related to the amount and type of food consumed. This firm relation raised global interest and concern toward radioactivity exposure from food intake (Al-Masri et al, 2004;Chau and Michalec, 2009;FSA, 2004;Gharbi et al, 2010;IAEA, 1989;Venturini and Sordi, 1999;WHO, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%