“…Following the discovery of nuclear fission in the 1940s, its economic importance increased greatly and mining, energy, and military industries became anthropogenic sources of U in natural waters . Existing remediation strategies include physical barriers or covers, plant uptake of radioelements, constructed wetlands, and abiotic or biotic strategies based on U reduction. , Indeed, reduced, tetravalent U [U(IV)] is considerably less soluble than the oxidized, hexavalent state [U(VI)], and consequently, reduction of aqueous U(VI) to insoluble U(IV) species is known to decrease its aqueous concentration. ,, Reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) can happen through biotic (e.g., bacteria enzymatically reducing uranium) , and abiotic [e.g., through Fe(II) species, that can be produced via microbial metabolism] processes. − Thus, to initiate reduction, contaminated groundwater can be amended with abiotic reductants, such as sulfide reagents or hydrogen gas, or with an electron donor (acetate, lactate) that stimulates microbial growth. The objective is to reduce U directly, enzymatically by the native microbial communities, or indirectly, by the formation of reduced compounds that reduce U abiotically, such as Fe(II) or sulfide species .…”