Abstract:[1] Submarine canyons, topographic features incising the continental slope, vary in both shape and size. The dynamics of short canyons have been observed and described in the field, in the laboratory, and with numerical simulations. Flow within long canyons, such as Juan de Fuca canyon, located between Vancouver Island and Washington State in the Pacific Northwest, is less well understood. Physical models of both long and short canyons have been constructed to understand the upwelling dynamics in long canyons … Show more
“…Downwelling patterns are seen over Astoria Canyon during upwelling wind relaxations (Hickey, 1997). Time-dependent flow patterns appear to dominate over advection flow patterns for weak flows in the laboratory (Waterhouse et al, 2009). …”
Section: Time-dependent Flow: Wind Bursts and Flow Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The advection dominated response is strongly dependent on the canyon topography and flow strength (Allen, 2004). For weaker flows it can be greatly enhanced if strongly convergent isobaths occur over the canyon (Allen, 2000;Waterhouse et al, 2009). The final relaxation phase sees strong, generally cyclonic flow within the canyon (Hickey, 1997).…”
Section: Phasing Of Canyon Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, cyclonic vorticity is also generated in the slope flow due to friction against the slope (Perenne et al, 2001b). There is some evidence that this latter vorticity may be less important than stretching (Flexas et al, 2008;Waterhouse et al, 2009). These vorticity patterns, with strong cyclonic vorticity (under both upwelling and downwelling) are for near uniform shelf flows.…”
Section: Vertical Structure Of Canyon Driven Upwellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This convergence leads to upwelling particularly in long canyons that closely approach the coast (Allen, 2000) even if these canyons are very wide and trough-like (Yuan, 2002). Upwelling tends to occur at the converged isobaths whether they occur near the head of the canyon (Yuan, 2002) or near the mouth (Waterhouse et al, 2009). Some of the clearest observations of enhanced upwelling near isobath convergence is seen at the head of Bio Bio Canyon (Sobarzo et al, 2001).…”
Abstract. Cross shelf-break exchange is limited by the tendency of geostrophic flow to follow bathymetric contours, not cross them. However, small scale topography, such as canyons, can reduce the local lengthscale of the flow and increase the local Rossby number. These higher Rossby numbers mean the flow is no longer purely geostrophic and significant cross-isobath flow can occur. This cross-isobath flow includes both upwelling and downwelling due to wind-driven shelf currents and the strong cascading flows of dense shelfwater into the ocean. Tidal currents usually run primarily parallel to the shelf-break topography. Canyons cut across these flows and thus are often regions of generation of strong baroclinic tides and internal waves. Canyons can also focus internal waves. Both processes lead to greatly elevated levels of mixing. Thus, through both advection and mixing processes, canyons can enhance Deep Ocean Shelf Exchange. Here we review the state of the science describing the dynamics of the flows and suggest further areas of research, particularly into quantifying fluxes of nutrients and carbon as well as heat and salt through canyons.
“…Downwelling patterns are seen over Astoria Canyon during upwelling wind relaxations (Hickey, 1997). Time-dependent flow patterns appear to dominate over advection flow patterns for weak flows in the laboratory (Waterhouse et al, 2009). …”
Section: Time-dependent Flow: Wind Bursts and Flow Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The advection dominated response is strongly dependent on the canyon topography and flow strength (Allen, 2004). For weaker flows it can be greatly enhanced if strongly convergent isobaths occur over the canyon (Allen, 2000;Waterhouse et al, 2009). The final relaxation phase sees strong, generally cyclonic flow within the canyon (Hickey, 1997).…”
Section: Phasing Of Canyon Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, cyclonic vorticity is also generated in the slope flow due to friction against the slope (Perenne et al, 2001b). There is some evidence that this latter vorticity may be less important than stretching (Flexas et al, 2008;Waterhouse et al, 2009). These vorticity patterns, with strong cyclonic vorticity (under both upwelling and downwelling) are for near uniform shelf flows.…”
Section: Vertical Structure Of Canyon Driven Upwellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This convergence leads to upwelling particularly in long canyons that closely approach the coast (Allen, 2000) even if these canyons are very wide and trough-like (Yuan, 2002). Upwelling tends to occur at the converged isobaths whether they occur near the head of the canyon (Yuan, 2002) or near the mouth (Waterhouse et al, 2009). Some of the clearest observations of enhanced upwelling near isobath convergence is seen at the head of Bio Bio Canyon (Sobarzo et al, 2001).…”
Abstract. Cross shelf-break exchange is limited by the tendency of geostrophic flow to follow bathymetric contours, not cross them. However, small scale topography, such as canyons, can reduce the local lengthscale of the flow and increase the local Rossby number. These higher Rossby numbers mean the flow is no longer purely geostrophic and significant cross-isobath flow can occur. This cross-isobath flow includes both upwelling and downwelling due to wind-driven shelf currents and the strong cascading flows of dense shelfwater into the ocean. Tidal currents usually run primarily parallel to the shelf-break topography. Canyons cut across these flows and thus are often regions of generation of strong baroclinic tides and internal waves. Canyons can also focus internal waves. Both processes lead to greatly elevated levels of mixing. Thus, through both advection and mixing processes, canyons can enhance Deep Ocean Shelf Exchange. Here we review the state of the science describing the dynamics of the flows and suggest further areas of research, particularly into quantifying fluxes of nutrients and carbon as well as heat and salt through canyons.
“…Vorticity in this flow can be generated by both flow separation [ Pérenne et al , 2001] and by stretching [ Hickey , 1997]. Recent laboratory [ Waterhouse et al , 2009] and observational studies [ Flexas et al , 2008] suggest that the latter probably dominates.…”
[1] The response over a submarine canyon to a several day upwelling event can be separated into three phases: an initial transient response; a later, much longer, "steady" advection-driven response; and a final relaxation phase. For the advection-driven phase over realistically steep, deep, and narrow canyons with near-uniform flow and stratification at rim depth, we have derived scale estimates for four key quantities. Observations from 5 real-world canyon studies and 3 laboratory studies are used to validate the scaling and estimate the scalar constant for each scale. Based on 4 geometric parameters of the canyon, the background stratification, the Coriolis parameter, and the incoming current, we can estimate (1) the depth of upwelling in the canyon to within 15 m, (2) the deep vorticity to within 15%, and (3) the presence/absence of a rim depth eddy can be determined. Based on laboratory data, (4) the total upwelling flux can also be estimated. The scaling analysis shows the importance of a Rossby number based on the radius of curvature of isobaths at the upstream mouth of the canyon. This Rossby number determines the ability of the flow to cross the canyon isobaths and generate the pressure gradient that drives upwelling in the canyon. Other important scales are a Rossby number based on the length of the canyon which measures the ability of the flow to lift isopycnals and a Burger number based on the width of the canyon that determines the likelihood of an eddy at rim depth. Generally, long canyons with sharply turning upstream isobaths, strong incoming flow, small Coriolis parameter, and weak stratification have the strongest upwelling response.Citation: Allen, S. E., and B. M. Hickey (2010), Dynamics of advection-driven upwelling over a shelf break submarine canyon,
A numerical model of the northern California Current System along the coasts of Washington and British Columbia is used to quantify the impact of submarine canyons on upwelling from the continental slope onto the shelf. Comparisons with an extensive set of observations show that the model adequately represents the seasonal development of near-bottom density, as well as along-shelf currents that are critical in governing shelf-slope exchange. Additional model runs with simplified coastlines and bathymetry are used to isolate the effects of submarine canyons. Near submarine canyons, equatorward flow over the outer shelf is correlated with dense water at canyon heads and subsequent formation of closed cyclonic eddies, which are both associated with cross-shelf ageostrophic forces. Lagrangian particles tracked from the slope to midshelf show that canyons are associated with upwelling from depths of $140-260 m. Source depths for upwelling are shallower than 150 m at locations away from canyons and in a model run with bathymetry that is uniform in the along-shelf direction. Water upwelled through canyons is more likely to be found near the bottom over the shelf. Onshore fluxes of relatively saline water through submarine canyons are large enough to increase volume-averaged salinity over the shelf by 0.1-0.2 psu during the early part of the upwelling season. The nitrate input from the slope to the Washington shelf associated with canyons is estimated to be 30-60% of that upwelled to the euphotic zone by local wind-driven upwelling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.