2014
DOI: 10.1038/nature12939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
204
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(42 reference statements)
5
204
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be interpreted as a sort of collective intelligence at the population level, but at the individual level due to the signal being asymmetric, it would bestow greater benefit on later migrating individuals. Salmon likely experiences selective pressure to group for a variety of reasons, including protection from predation (Handegard et al 2012;Marras et al 2012) from larger fish, birds, marine mam mals, and sharks, for group hunting (Handegard et al 2012), hydrodynamic benefits (Ross et al 1992;Herskin and Steffensen 1998;Portugal et al 2014), and tracking gradients associated with appropriate living conditions or patchily distrib uted prey (Couzin 2007;Torney et al 2009Torney et al , 2011Berdahl et al 2013). Such coordinated group living may confer benefits of collective navi gation during migrations, even if the grouping originally evolved for other reasons.…”
Section: Salmon Schoolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be interpreted as a sort of collective intelligence at the population level, but at the individual level due to the signal being asymmetric, it would bestow greater benefit on later migrating individuals. Salmon likely experiences selective pressure to group for a variety of reasons, including protection from predation (Handegard et al 2012;Marras et al 2012) from larger fish, birds, marine mam mals, and sharks, for group hunting (Handegard et al 2012), hydrodynamic benefits (Ross et al 1992;Herskin and Steffensen 1998;Portugal et al 2014), and tracking gradients associated with appropriate living conditions or patchily distrib uted prey (Couzin 2007;Torney et al 2009Torney et al , 2011Berdahl et al 2013). Such coordinated group living may confer benefits of collective navi gation during migrations, even if the grouping originally evolved for other reasons.…”
Section: Salmon Schoolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in birds that fly in groups, the flight formation may also influence whether sleep is possible in flight. For example, if flapping in V-formations requires full attention to maximize the aerodynamic benefits [87] and avoid collisions, then even USWS might not be possible in birds that rely on this flight strategy.…”
Section: Rsfsroyalsocietypublishingorg Interface Focus 7: 20160082mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed effect of flock size was, however, opposite to the prediction from energy saving in formation flight. Even if large species may obtain aerodynamic benefit from formation flight [18,46], such a benefit is unlikely in our terns that most often formed quite loose flocks with large inter-individual distances, although tight formations did also occur on migration. A potential mechanistic explanation for the observed effect of flock size on airspeed could result from the increased likelihood of inclusion of heavy individuals in flocks of increasing numbers from random sampling from a source population.…”
Section: (C) Airspeedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flight in flock formation is expected to alleviate flight cost by reducing the induced drag of individual birds [17,18], which should reduce the characteristic flight speeds U mr and U mt , respectively [19]. However, the few observations available where flight speed was measured in relation to flock size suggest that airspeed increases with increasing flock size [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%