“…Interestingly, the smallest complex which also showed no significant variation during the analysis was pDNA:LD4 (1:100) with Lipofectamine™. Particle size and particle surface charge are two main factors that dictates internalization of the delivery complex by the cell and is directly correlated to transfection efficiency [32,33]. Thus, by monitoring both variables we are able to correlate and perhaps explain the results found during transfection.…”
Section: Lc8 With Dna Binding Domain 4 Interacts With Pdna Generatingmentioning
“…Interestingly, the smallest complex which also showed no significant variation during the analysis was pDNA:LD4 (1:100) with Lipofectamine™. Particle size and particle surface charge are two main factors that dictates internalization of the delivery complex by the cell and is directly correlated to transfection efficiency [32,33]. Thus, by monitoring both variables we are able to correlate and perhaps explain the results found during transfection.…”
Section: Lc8 With Dna Binding Domain 4 Interacts With Pdna Generatingmentioning
“…Cellular internalization and trans-barrier trafficking of NPs Endocytic event cascade is activated by the signaling of the NP on the cell surface, 6 which aligns surface proteins to prompt clathrin recruitment from the cytosol to begin clathrin-coating on the inner membrane of the cell. An adaptor protein, Epsin, is involved in the initial stages of membrane curvature and pit formation and accessory proteins such as dynamin (GTPase) affect vesicle formation from shallow to deep invagination by inducing deformation of the membrane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 With the aid of dynamin, a clathrin-coated vesicle with a size of 100-150 nm is formed due to polymerization of the coat complex and the NP-containing clathrin-coated vesicle then internally detaches from the donor membrane. 6 Once within the cell, clathrin and adaptor proteins uncoat to allow fusing of the vesicle within the cell to release the endocytosed NPs ( Figure 3). …”
Cellular internalization and trans-barrier transport of nanoparticles can be manipulated on the basis of the physicochemical and mechanical characteristics of nanoparticles. Research has shown that these factors significantly influence the uptake of nanoparticles. Dictating these characteristics allows for the control of the rate and extent of cellular uptake, as well as delivering the drug-loaded nanosystem intra-cellularly, which is imperative for drugs that require a specific cellular level to exert their effects. Additionally, physicochemical characteristics of the nanoparticles should be optimal for the nanosystem to bypass the natural restricting phenomena of the body and act therapeutically at the targeted site. The factors at the focal point of emerging smart nanomedicines include nanoparticle size, surface charge, shape, hydrophobicity, surface chemistry, and even protein and ligand conjugates. Hence, this review discusses the mechanism of internalization of nanoparticles and ideal nanoparticle characteristics that allow them to evade the biological barriers in order to achieve optimal cellular uptake in different organ systems. Identifying these parameters assists with the progression of nanomedicine as an outstanding vector of pharmaceuticals.
“…The usage of phagocytosis and macropinocytosis seems very limited, as it only exists in specialized cells such as macrophages monocytes, dendritic cells or antigen presenting cells. Thus, CME and CvME are the best-characterized types of endocytosis in non-viral gene therapy field, although CvME pathway is less well understood [56]. It is described that LMWC based polyplexes could enter the cell via these two endocytic pathways, however, there is a lack of consensus in the scientific area [53,57].…”
Section: Cellular Binding and Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the mechanism of internalization, polyplexes must escape from the endosome before being degraded in the lysosome. Polyplexes that enter the cell via CME are confined within endosomes that will suffer a maturation process involving the compartment acidification resulting in late endosomes and finally, lysosomes [56]. The release of the pDNA cargo from these vesicles seems to be the bottleneck in the transfection process [57], since the acidic environment inside lysosome may lead to the degradation of the pDNA if it does not escape from the endosome on time.…”
Section: Endolysosomal Escape and Polyplex Dissociationmentioning
Non-viral gene delivery vectors are emerging as a safer alternative to viral vectors. Among natural polymers, chitosan (Ch) is the most studied one, and low molecular weight Ch, specifically, presents a wide range of advantages for non-viral pDNA delivery. It is crucial to determine the best process for the formation of Low Molecular Weight Chitosan (LMWC)-pDNA complexes and to characterize their physicochemical properties to better understand their behavior once the polyplexes are administered. The transfection efficiency of Ch based polyplexes is relatively low. Therefore, it is essential to understand all the transfection process, including the cellular uptake, endosomal escape and nuclear import, together with the parameters involved in the process to improve the design and development of the non-viral vectors. The aim of this review is to describe the formation and characterization of LMWC based polyplexes, the in vitro transfection process and finally, the in vivo applications of LMWC based polyplexes for gene therapy purposes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.