2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-005-5674-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uptake and Sequestration of Naphthalene and 1,2-Dichlorobenzene by C60

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed that the resistant desorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants from the aggregates of C 60 is due to the adsorption of organic molecules within the micropores of the C 60 aggregates [12,[26][27][28]. Thus, it might be reasonable to speculate that the two groups of nC 60 samples involved in the present study are of different microporous structures, resulting from the differences in aggregate formation between these two groups during the preparation of nC 60 samples.…”
Section: Mechanistic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It has been proposed that the resistant desorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants from the aggregates of C 60 is due to the adsorption of organic molecules within the micropores of the C 60 aggregates [12,[26][27][28]. Thus, it might be reasonable to speculate that the two groups of nC 60 samples involved in the present study are of different microporous structures, resulting from the differences in aggregate formation between these two groups during the preparation of nC 60 samples.…”
Section: Mechanistic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…If CNP aggregates could be dispersed effectively, the surface area and adsorption of organic contaminants would be expected to increase. Cheng et al (2005) found the adsorption of naphthalene and 1,2-dichlorobenzene on dispersed C 60 in toluene was orders of magnitude higher than that of aggregated C 60 . These authors also ml/g) were higher than those on "C 60 large aggregates" (K d =10 2.39 ml/g).…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, at a concentration of 0.5 % CNMs, 14 C-phenanthrene was mineralised to a greater extent with SWCNT amendments than FS. This disparity was attributed to variation in rates of phenanthrene desorption from the solid to aqueous phase, as desorption hysteresis occurs more commonly with fullerenes than CNTs due to differences in aggregate structure and availability of sorption sites (Cheng et al, 2005;Yang and Xing, 2007;Towell et al, 2011). The HPCD extractability of 14 C-phenanthrene was significantly reduced as a result of CNM amendment in a concentration-dependant manner due to increased numbers of sorption sites resulting in enhanced phenanthrene sorption (Towell et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Bioavailability and Bioaccessibility Of Cnm-associated Cmentioning
confidence: 99%