2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13273-014-0002-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uptake and bioaccumulation of titanium- and silver-nanoparticles in aquatic ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many reviews have been published that focus on, for example,1 )environmental realism of test conditions, [33] 2) modeling approaches, [34] 3) effects of organic matter on toxicity, [35] and 4) ecotoxicological effects of various ENPs, [36][37][38][39] there still seems to be al ack of reviews assessing nanoparticle effects in terms of test setups and effects observed. Handy et al [40] and Petersen et al [41] reviewed and presented aw ide range of practical considerations to be considered when conducting ecotoxicological tests with ENPs.H owever,t he practical considerations and the confounding factors of ENPs in test setups have to,o ur knowledge,n ot been reviewed in regard to assessing the effects of the nanoparticles.Isolating the nanoparticle effect caused by the novel intrinsic properties of the ENPs because of their size is not possible from the currently published reviews.Throughout this Review the implications of the properties of ENPs and their related behavior in test media before,d uring,a nd after ecotoxicity testing will be evaluated with aspecific focus on the base set of aquatic organisms (fish, crustaceans,a nd algae) used for classification, labeling,a nd concentrationresponse assessment to determine the nanoparticle effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many reviews have been published that focus on, for example,1 )environmental realism of test conditions, [33] 2) modeling approaches, [34] 3) effects of organic matter on toxicity, [35] and 4) ecotoxicological effects of various ENPs, [36][37][38][39] there still seems to be al ack of reviews assessing nanoparticle effects in terms of test setups and effects observed. Handy et al [40] and Petersen et al [41] reviewed and presented aw ide range of practical considerations to be considered when conducting ecotoxicological tests with ENPs.H owever,t he practical considerations and the confounding factors of ENPs in test setups have to,o ur knowledge,n ot been reviewed in regard to assessing the effects of the nanoparticles.Isolating the nanoparticle effect caused by the novel intrinsic properties of the ENPs because of their size is not possible from the currently published reviews.Throughout this Review the implications of the properties of ENPs and their related behavior in test media before,d uring,a nd after ecotoxicity testing will be evaluated with aspecific focus on the base set of aquatic organisms (fish, crustaceans,a nd algae) used for classification, labeling,a nd concentrationresponse assessment to determine the nanoparticle effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 1916 to 2011, an estimated total of 165 050 000 metric tonnes of TiO 2 pigment were produced worldwide (bulk form and nanoform combined), with a current annual estimated production of more than 6 million tonnes/yr . Reviews of nano‐TiO 2 toxicology are available across various evolutionary groups of species , often summarizing half maximal effective concentration (EC50), half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), and median lethal concentration (LC50) values. Nano‐TiO 2 is also photoactive and produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) on illumination .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposures of fish to AgNPs can lead to accumulation of total Ag in tissues, such as the liver and intestines, and the Ag can accumulate in organelles, including the nucleus and mitochondria . In the present study, fish from the AgNP treatments accumulated approximately 10‐fold less total Ag in tissues than fish from the Ag + treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%