2018
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/27/5/055201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upstream ion wave excitation in an ion-beam–plasma system

Abstract: Plasma normal modes in ion-beam-plasma systems were experimentally investigated previously only for the waves propagating in the downstream (along the beam) direction. In this paper, the ion wave excitation and propagation in the upstream (against the beam) direction in an ion-beam-plasma system were experimentally studied in a double plasma device. The waves were launched by applying a ramp voltage to a negatively biased excitation grid. Two kinds of wave signals were detected, one is a particle signal compos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The excited wave signals were detected by measuring the perturbations in the electron density (approximately equal to the ion density perturbation because of the quasi-neutrality) with the planar probe and were monitored on a digital oscilloscope. Different from the previous observations, [27,28] here we observed two kinds of pseudowaves, depending on the beam energy. Figure 3 shows the evolutions of the received signals, detected at 123 mm from the EG (the signals are well separated at this distance), with respect to the beam energy for a given excitation voltage with τ = 3.59 µs and V pp = 16 V. In the case of high beam energy (ε b = 20 eV), the three normal modes (to be identified later) were observed, i.e., the fast beam mode (F), the slow beam mode (S), and the background ion-acoustic mode (IA).…”
Section: Lauching Of the Wavescontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The excited wave signals were detected by measuring the perturbations in the electron density (approximately equal to the ion density perturbation because of the quasi-neutrality) with the planar probe and were monitored on a digital oscilloscope. Different from the previous observations, [27,28] here we observed two kinds of pseudowaves, depending on the beam energy. Figure 3 shows the evolutions of the received signals, detected at 123 mm from the EG (the signals are well separated at this distance), with respect to the beam energy for a given excitation voltage with τ = 3.59 µs and V pp = 16 V. In the case of high beam energy (ε b = 20 eV), the three normal modes (to be identified later) were observed, i.e., the fast beam mode (F), the slow beam mode (S), and the background ion-acoustic mode (IA).…”
Section: Lauching Of the Wavescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the downstream direction, these burst ions consist two groups: the beam and the background, since the original ions moving from the upstream to the downstream direction in the sheath regions contain these two components. This case is opposed to the case for the burst-085201-4 ions in the upstream direction where there is only background group [28] (i.e., no burst ions originating from the beam ions moving from the downstream to the upstream direction, since the ion beam only move from the upstream to the downstream direction). The average velocity of the burst ions can be approximated by [26]…”
Section: Identification Of the Wavesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations