2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-6686-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upstream flood pattern recognition based on downstream events

Abstract: Reverse stream flood routing determines the upstream hydrograph in a stream reach given the downstream hydrograph. The Muskingum model of flood routing involves parameters that govern the routed hydrograph. These parameters are herein estimated using simulation methods coupled with optimization tools to achieve optimized parameters. Different simulation methods are shown to perform unequally in the estimation of nonlinear Muskingum parameters. This paper presents two simulation methods for nonlinear Muskingum … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, with an output hydrograph in hand, the goal is to obtain the input hydrograph that generated it through reverse routing. Although less common than the conventional upstream-to-downstream routing, many authors, such as Das (2009), Badfar et al (2021), andHaddad et al (2018), have analyzed such a situation in past studies. However, Koussis et al (2012) warns that simply inverting the calculation between 𝐼 and 𝑂 does not constitute a well-defined problem according to the Muskingum method, and consequently, computational rounding errors or input data errors are expected to be quickly amplified and propagated between numerical iterations.…”
Section: Upstream Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, with an output hydrograph in hand, the goal is to obtain the input hydrograph that generated it through reverse routing. Although less common than the conventional upstream-to-downstream routing, many authors, such as Das (2009), Badfar et al (2021), andHaddad et al (2018), have analyzed such a situation in past studies. However, Koussis et al (2012) warns that simply inverting the calculation between 𝐼 and 𝑂 does not constitute a well-defined problem according to the Muskingum method, and consequently, computational rounding errors or input data errors are expected to be quickly amplified and propagated between numerical iterations.…”
Section: Upstream Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical solutions for flood routing equations were determined by applying 16 variants of the Runge-Kutta schemes [60][61][62]. The accuracy of these numerical analyses was assessed by comparing them to the analytical solutions provided by Paik (2008) and Nematollahi et al (2021) as benchmark solutions [55,59].…”
Section: Solutions Of Flood Routing Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inversion process facilitates the realization of real-time operational adjustments for the upstream reservoir. To obtain the operation plan for the upper reaches of the river, Bozorg-Haddad et al [20] proposed two nonlinear Muskingum inversion simulation methods based on Euler equations and Runge-Kutta 4th order equations, and they verified them with historical data. The results showed that the second method had a better fitting effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%