Upstream Effects of Generic Advertising: The Case of Catfish

Kinnucan, Henry W.; Paudel, Laxmi

doi:10.1086/mre.16.2.42628832

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Freebairn and Davis (1982) and Alston and Scobie (1983) provide an explicit method to analyze tax incidence distribution in the multi-stage structure. Kinnucan and Paudel (2001) extend the tax incidences into two aspects: first, incidences were calculated by considering the impacts in the overall inputs markets; and second, incidences were calculated by only considering the impact in a particular input market. Following this method, the subsidy incidences were measured with two different perspectives:…”

Section: Economic Model In Multi-stage Marketmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Farmers' welfare gains Alston et al (1995) mention that farmers' gains from fertilizer subsidies cannot simply be measured by consumer surplus in the fertilizer market because some contribution can be found in other sectors such as non-fertilizer sector and output sector. Kinnucan and Paudel (2001) introduced two alternative methods to compute the farmers' return in response to an increase in promotion. One way is to build a generalized "profit" function that takes into account vertical integration; the other is to measure farmers' "profit" by comparing the gains in producer surplus with the losses in producer surplus [4].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Those results are based on a conventional measurement which would fail to account for farmers' integration into processing. A drawback in the analysis of farmers' gain, mentioned by Kinnucan and Paudel (2001), is that farmers' benefits calculated by "profit" do not take into account the subsidy scheme's general equilibrium effects, which may lead to misleading results with respect to the actual impacts of the subsidy on farmers.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Fertilizer industry subsidies in China: who are the beneficiaries?

Sheng

Zhang

Nadolnyak

et al. 2014

China Agricultural Economic Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – Since 2004, subsidies increased by 670 percent in the Chinese fertilizer industry to reduce the farmer's burden. The purpose of this paper is to assess whether subsidies benefit the target groups, the fertilizer subsidy distribution pattern and benefit allocation pattern among fertilizer producers and other sectors were investigated. Design/methodology/approach – The Muth model is extended to evaluate the impacts of a subsidy on multi-stage markets. Findings – It is found that the total benefits from the policy are about RMB 7.7 billion yuans. The fertilizer suppliers gain about RMB 51 billion yuans from the favorable policy with mean subsidy incidence 0.8 and capturing about 70 percent of total surplus. Social implications – The results suggest that transferring parts of subsidies to the non-fertilizer sectors could be considered an efficient way to redistribute welfare indifferent sectors. Originality/value – This study first use the equilibrium displacement model to quantity the distribution of fertilizer subsidy in a vertical market in China.

show abstract

Section: Economic Model In Multi-stage Marketmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fertilizer industry subsidies in China: who are the beneficiaries?

Sheng

Zhang

Nadolnyak

et al. 2014

China Agricultural Economic Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The level of aggregation in most studies is such that catfish is often treated as a single product (see Houston & Ermita, 1992;Kinnucan, 2003;Kinnucan & Paudel, 2001;Kouka, 1995;Ligeon, Jolly, & Jackson, 1996; for examples). These studies (as well as others) are not necessarily flawed because of the level of aggregation assumed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The importance of product cut and form when estimating fish demand: the case of U.S. Catfish

Muhammad

Hanson

2009

Agribusiness

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The absolute price version of the Rotterdam model was used in the estimation of U.S. catfish demand where catfish was differentiated by product cut (whole, fillet, and other) and product form (fresh and frozen). Likelihood ratio tests were used to determine the importance of product form in demand (product form aggregation). Likelihood ratio tests were also used to determine if fresh products were separable from frozen products (product form separability). Product form aggregation was rejected at a probability of 0.999, suggesting that fresh and frozen catfish products are not homogenous. The hypothesis, no product form separability, failed to be rejected at the 0.05 significance level, but was rejected at the 0.01 significance level. Test results suggest that it is more acceptable to focus on a single product group (e.g., frozen products) than to assume that catfish products are perfectly aggregatable across product forms. [JEL classifications: Q11, Q13, Q22]. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

show abstract

Generic and Brand Advertising Strategies Under Inter-Industry Competition

Lin

Krishnamurthy

2017

Cust. Need. and Solut.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Upstream Effects of Generic Advertising: The Case of Catfish

Cited by 7 publications

References 17 publications

Fertilizer industry subsidies in China: who are the beneficiaries?

Fertilizer industry subsidies in China: who are the beneficiaries?

The importance of product cut and form when estimating fish demand: the case of U.S. Catfish

Generic and Brand Advertising Strategies Under Inter-Industry Competition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About