2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-015-4726-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upscaling the shallow water model with a novel roughness formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acknowledging the salient importance of the inundation ratio Λ, upscaled roughness formulations have been proposed with inundation ratio-dependent Manning coecients [36].…”
Section: Momentum Source Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledging the salient importance of the inundation ratio Λ, upscaled roughness formulations have been proposed with inundation ratio-dependent Manning coecients [36].…”
Section: Momentum Source Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In shallow water modeling of river hydraulics (Özgen et al, 2013;Kesserwani and Liang, 2015), urban flooding (Liang, 2010;Mignot et al, 2006), urban runoff (Cea et al, 2010;Liang et al, 2007;Liang et al, 2015) and rainfall-runoff on natural environments (Mügler et al, 2011;Özgen et al, 2015;Simons et al, 2014;Viero et al 2014), the topographical features have a large influence on the numerical results. The availability of digital elevation data has increased significantly due to recent improvements in surveying technology, notably laser scanning and light detection and ranging (LIDAR) technologies, which provide high-resolution data sets at relatively low cost (Gessner et al, 2014;Gourbesville, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be noticed that while many studies have pointed out the importance of a hydrological network [19], vegetation resistance [18,20,21,42], and infiltration [23] in flow modeling, these factors were not considered here, and could explain some errors in our simulation. However, the integration of these factors in hydrological modeling remains challenging for three reasons.…”
Section: Model Performance and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, LiDAR-based digital terrain models (DTM) provide high-resolution spatial information, and have been found to be suitable for the characterization of subtle ground altimetry variations in wetlands [15]. As a result, many studies have pointed out the strong influence of microtopography that has been derived from LiDAR DTMs and shallow patterns in overland flow simulations [16][17][18][19][20][21]. As an example, a LiDAR-based DTM was used to successfully assess the maximum water storage capacity in wetlands [22], model a storm event at the watershed scale [23], and simulate the discontinuous puddle-to-puddle overland flow dynamics for infiltrating surfaces [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%