2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06467.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upregulation of translational machinery and distinct genetic subgroups characterise hyperdiploidy in multiple myeloma

Abstract: Summary Karyotypic instability, including numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations, represents a distinct feature of multiple myeloma (MM). About 40–50% of patients display hyperdiploidy, defined by recurrent trisomies of non‐random chromosomes. To molecularly characterise hyperdiploid (H) and nonhyperdiploid (NH) MM, we analysed the gene expression profiles of 66 primary tumours, and used fluorescence in situ hybridisation to investigate the major chromosomal alterations. The differential expression o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(66 reference statements)
5
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to the previously reported frequencies of H-MM and NH-MM. [33][34][35] It is notable that the classification is capable of discerning H-MM by virtue of wholechromosome gains but cannot readily identify differences in the incidence of IgH translocations.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Somatic Copy Number Changes Between Aa and Eamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are similar to the previously reported frequencies of H-MM and NH-MM. [33][34][35] It is notable that the classification is capable of discerning H-MM by virtue of wholechromosome gains but cannot readily identify differences in the incidence of IgH translocations.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Somatic Copy Number Changes Between Aa and Eamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supervised gene expression analyses were performed using the significance analysis of microarrays software (SAM version 4.0; Excel front-end publicly available at http:// www-stat.stanford.edu//tibs/SAM/index.html; ref. 32) as previously reported (33). The stringency level of the 90th percentile of false discovery rate being equal to zero was applied.…”
Section: Gene Expression Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differentially expressed genes discriminating the considered classes were identified using the Significant Analysis of Microarrays software version 4.00 as previously described (19). The functional annotation analysis on the selected lists was carried out using the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA; ref.…”
Section: Microarray Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%