2006
DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2006.11753867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper vs Lower Extremity Arterial Function After Spinal Cord Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the ending values of FMD in this study were still lower than those we obtained in able-bodied subjects (6.675.9 versus 12.075.2%, respectively) for our previous study, 22 suggesting that further improvements may be possible.…”
Section: Flow-mediated Dilationcontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, the ending values of FMD in this study were still lower than those we obtained in able-bodied subjects (6.675.9 versus 12.075.2%, respectively) for our previous study, 22 suggesting that further improvements may be possible.…”
Section: Flow-mediated Dilationcontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…In a previous study, we found that FMD and arterial range were significantly lower in the legs of patients with SCI versus controls, even though the arms were similar between groups. 22 These findings suggest that interventions to improve SCI cardiovascular health should target the lower extremities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…68 In the SFA, individuals with SCI exhibit an increased absolute FMD compared with AB individuals; 69 however, this difference is no longer present when the degree of FMD is corrected for area under the shear rate curve, from the time of occluding cuff deflation to that of peak diameter attainment. 62 Such correction for the eliciting shear stress stimulus on the endothelial cell membrane is considered critical, especially in cases where arteries are compared with different baseline diameters (for example, SCI vs control).…”
Section: Conduit Arterial Function After Sci Structural Adaptationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In individuals with SCI, FMD has been examined in the superficial femoral artery (SFA), 62,66,67 the posterior tibial artery, 68 brachial artery 67 and the radial artery. 68 In the SFA, individuals with SCI exhibit an increased absolute FMD compared with AB individuals; 69 however, this difference is no longer present when the degree of FMD is corrected for area under the shear rate curve, from the time of occluding cuff deflation to that of peak diameter attainment.…”
Section: Conduit Arterial Function After Sci Structural Adaptationsmentioning
confidence: 99%