1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00397083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper temperature tolerances of some European molluscs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is probably because physiological tolerance, when assessed using metrics such as activity, decline with temperature above and below an optimum in a similar fashion to CT max (e.g. Ansell et al, 1981;Peck et al, 2004), and there is a hierarchy of temperature tolerance with physiological scale where whole-animal CT max is lower than limits for tissues and then cellular level processes, and the different levels appear to be linked in a cascade (Pörtner et al, 2007). Thus, for populations living at sites where temperatures are either above or below optimum, the capacity to perform the required normal functions and activities declines.…”
Section: Ct Max and Estimations Of Long-term Thermal Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably because physiological tolerance, when assessed using metrics such as activity, decline with temperature above and below an optimum in a similar fashion to CT max (e.g. Ansell et al, 1981;Peck et al, 2004), and there is a hierarchy of temperature tolerance with physiological scale where whole-animal CT max is lower than limits for tissues and then cellular level processes, and the different levels appear to be linked in a cascade (Pörtner et al, 2007). Thus, for populations living at sites where temperatures are either above or below optimum, the capacity to perform the required normal functions and activities declines.…”
Section: Ct Max and Estimations Of Long-term Thermal Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential glacial refugial zone might have been the Celtic Sea southwest of the British ice sheet (Ménot et al 2006). C. edule performs best in non-stagnant water between 10 and 20°C but survives a wide range of 0-43°C (e.g., Ansell et al 1981;Wilson 1981;Strasser et al 2001;Genelt-Yanovskiy et al 2010). Therefore, temperature alone is unlikely to drive this species to extinction as long as partial populations can survive at greater depth subtidally to avoid extreme temperatures of the intertidal zone (e.g., Eisma 1966;Dörjes et al 1986;Dekker 1989;Bazairi et al 2003;Sousa et al 2006).…”
Section: Sy Symentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wallis (1975), Ansell and McLachlan (1980) and Rajagopal et al (1995bRajagopal et al ( , 1995c2003) reported similar results for some other bivalves. Kennedy and Mihursky (1971) and 1981) observed a decrease in mortality with increasing age of the bivalves at different temperatures. Rajagopal (1997) reported that size-dependent variation with the thermal tolerance of mussel, B. variabilis is not significant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%