1970
DOI: 10.3133/pp620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper Precambrian and lower Cambrian strata in the southern Great Basin, California and Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
217
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
217
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The depositional environment of the Great Basin is relatively well known and three major environments are recognized; inner, middle and outer shelf facies (Stewart, 1970;Webster, 2011). Although brachiopods are known from all three facies belts, the distributions of individual taxa remain poorly understood, and a detailed discussion of this topic is presently impossible.…”
Section: Western Laurentiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depositional environment of the Great Basin is relatively well known and three major environments are recognized; inner, middle and outer shelf facies (Stewart, 1970;Webster, 2011). Although brachiopods are known from all three facies belts, the distributions of individual taxa remain poorly understood, and a detailed discussion of this topic is presently impossible.…”
Section: Western Laurentiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The ages of these units are well-constrained through temporal correlations built upon biostratigraphic, chemostratigraphic and radiometric data (Stewart, 1970;Stewart et al, 1984;ChristieBlick and Levy, 1989;Heaman and Grotzinger, 1992;Corsetti and Hagadorn, 2000;Jenkins et al, 2002;Corsetti and Kaufman, 2003;Zhou et al, 2004;Jiang et al, 2007;Sour-Tovar et al, 2007;Loyd et al, 2012b). Fig.…”
Section: Geologic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, 2). Based on lithofacies and trilobite distribution patterns, the depositional environment is separated into inner, middle, and outer shelf facies realms (e.g., Stewart, 1970;Palmer and Halley, 1979;Sundberg and McCollum, 2003a;Sundberg, 2011;Webster, 2011a;Figs. 1, 2).…”
Section: General Geology and Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dyeran Mule Spring Limestone is represented by predominately shallow subtidal-intertidal carbonates and is subdivided into: (1) a lower unit, composed of cliff-forming bioturbated limestone; (2) a middle unit, composed of bioclastic, oncolitic, oolitic, and peloidal limestones with numerous claystone intercalations; and (3) an upper cliff-forming unit composed of oncolitic and fenestral limestones with intercalated intraformational conglomerates ( Fig. 2; Nelson, 1962;Stewart, 1970;Albers and Stewart, 1972;Webster, 2011a, b). The Mule Spring Limestone is overlain by the siliciclastic and carbonate, partly highly condensed Emigrant Formation (uppermost Dyeran-Sunwaptan Stage) in western Nevada and by the Monola Formation in Death Valley National Park of eastern California (e.g., Palmer, 1971;Palmer and Halley, 1979;Sundberg, 2011;Sundberg et al, 2011).…”
Section: General Geology and Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%