2017
DOI: 10.23867/ri0282d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian Shelf-to-Basin Facies Architecture and Trends, Eastern Shelf of the Southern Midland Basin, West Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…F4 and F5 are believed to have been deposited during intermediate sea level when the Eastern Shelf was partly (for example, shelf margin) occupied by a carbonate platform (Peng et al ., 2020a). This interpretation is consistent with the previously established stratigraphic framework of Upper Pennsylvanian–Lower Permian successions from the Eastern Shelf to deep Midland Basin (Brown et al ., 1990; Hamlin & Baumgardner, 2012; Hentz et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…F4 and F5 are believed to have been deposited during intermediate sea level when the Eastern Shelf was partly (for example, shelf margin) occupied by a carbonate platform (Peng et al ., 2020a). This interpretation is consistent with the previously established stratigraphic framework of Upper Pennsylvanian–Lower Permian successions from the Eastern Shelf to deep Midland Basin (Brown et al ., 1990; Hamlin & Baumgardner, 2012; Hentz et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High amplitude glacioeustatic sea‐level variations (mean: ca 100 m) during the Late Palaeozoic Ice Age are believed to have been associated with lithofacies cyclicity in Upper Pennsylvanian–Lower Permian successions across the Eastern Shelf and deep Midland Basin (Brown et al ., 1990; Hentz et al ., 2017). Specifically, carbonate platforms developed on the surrounding shelves of the Midland Basin during an interglacial sea‐level highstand (Fig.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given that the formations of Northeast Texas are terrestrial (Wichita Group), the boundaries of the formations of the Lower Wichita Group can only be correlated precisely with the Art 2 lowstand using the equivalent marine formations in South Texas. Thus, according to Hentz et al 102 , the deposition of the Coleman Junction Limestone Member corresponds to a transgression system that followed a lowstand between depositional cycles 16 and 17. This lowstand appears in the middle of two regressive sandstones that were deposited between the Coleman Junction Limestone and the Sedwick Limestone (see Table 2 in ref.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Clado-stratigraphic Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ages of the north-central Texas formations were updated based on the recent temporal definition of the Coleman Junction, the top of which correlates with the Wolfcampian-Leonardian boundary 102 . After the North American marine biostratigraphic zones were calibrated to the vicariant model, the Wolfcampian-Leonardian boundary correlated with the end of the Art 2 sea-level lowstand.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Clado-stratigraphic Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation