2015
DOI: 10.5194/se-6-73-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper mantle structure around the Trans-European Suture Zone obtained by teleseismic tomography

Abstract: Abstract. The presented study aims to resolve the upper mantle structure around the Trans-European Suture Zone (TESZ), which is the major tectonic boundary in Europe. The data of 183 temporary and permanent seismic stations operated during the period of the PASsive Seismic Experiment (PASSEQ) 2006-2008 within the study area from Germany to Lithuania was used to compile the data set of manually picked 6008 top-quality arrivals of P waves from teleseismic earthquakes. We used the TELINV nonlinear teleseismic tom… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
5
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are sparse compared to the study area, and the spatial resolution is questionable; however, the thick seismic lithosphere reported by was also found in the area during other studies. Koulakov et al (2009) observed the positive P wave velocity anomaly beneath the EEC down to at least 300 km, which indicates even thicker lithosphere compared to . Legendre et al (2012) find no indications of a deep cratonic root below about 330 km for the EEC, while Geissler et al (2010) do not observe any clear indications of deep seismic LAB beneath the EEC either.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data are sparse compared to the study area, and the spatial resolution is questionable; however, the thick seismic lithosphere reported by was also found in the area during other studies. Koulakov et al (2009) observed the positive P wave velocity anomaly beneath the EEC down to at least 300 km, which indicates even thicker lithosphere compared to . Legendre et al (2012) find no indications of a deep cratonic root below about 330 km for the EEC, while Geissler et al (2010) do not observe any clear indications of deep seismic LAB beneath the EEC either.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Compared to the crust, the structure of the lithosphere and the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB) in the TESZ and its surroundings is poorly known. While it was found that the cratonic lithosphere extends much deeper than that of the younger continental regions (e.g., Eaton et al, 2009;Shomali et al, 2006;Gregersen et al, 2010), the studies revealed that the structure of the lithosphere and the LAB differs a lot on both sides of the TESZ (e.g., Zielhuis and Nolet, 1994;Majorowicz et al, 2003;Koulakov et al, 2009;Wilde-Piórko et al, 2010). Regarding different physical properties and geophysical techniques, the LAB has different practical definitions: (1) the seismic LAB defines the transition between the solid outer layer of the Earth, which is characterized by higher seismic velocity values, and its interior, which is characterized by lower seismic velocity values; (2) the thermal LAB defines the transition between the outer layer with dominating conductive heat transfer above the convective mantle that usually coincides with a depth of a constant isotherm of about 1300 • C (McKenzie, 1967); (3) the electrical LAB is a transition between the generally electrically resistive outer layer of the Earth and the conductive layer in the upper mantle.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TTZ, at the contact between the East European Craton and West European Platform, is marked by an increased thickness of the crust, forming the "crustal keel", followed to the NE by a steep decrease of the Moho discontinuity depth from 48 km beneath the keel to 37-38 to the SW (Mazur et al, 2015). The TTZ is a major lithospheric structure, which appears to be a deep-seated boundary reaching at least down to a depth of about 200 km (e.g., Zielhuis and Nolet, 1994;Schweitzer, 1995;Wilde-Piórko et al, 2010;Knapmeyer-Endrun et al, 2014;Janutyte et al, 2014Janutyte et al, , 2015Soomro et al, 2016).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As mentioned above, the R matrix contains full information on the resolution, however reliability of the inversion depends also on adequacy of the starting model or stability of the scheme. To be able to investigate those factors while retaining some insight into the resolution we adopted a checkerboard test known from the seismic tomography (e.g., Janutyte et al 2015) to the 1D problem.…”
Section: Checkerboard Test For a General 1d Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%