2006
DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.1815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper limit of the tetrahedral rotation angle and factors affecting octahedral flattening in synthetic and natural 1M polytype C2/m space group micas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(100 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all the Fe-and Ti-rich samples (see Table 10, from sample VUT191_10 to VUT191_19), a tendency toward a systematic underestimation of the average octahedral bond distances is apparent. Such systematic variations of the observed bond lengths with respect to the radii of Shannon (1976) are already known (Bailey 1984;Gibbs et al 1997;Mercier et al 2006). In particular, Mercier et al (2006) observed that for non end-member single-crystal biotite-1M structure, bond lengths calculated from Shannon's radii tend to overestimate octahedral mean bond lengths between the Fe 2+ and Mg 2+ end-member, whereas the opposite is true when substitution by smaller +3, +4 cations occurs.…”
Section: Crystal Chemistrysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In all the Fe-and Ti-rich samples (see Table 10, from sample VUT191_10 to VUT191_19), a tendency toward a systematic underestimation of the average octahedral bond distances is apparent. Such systematic variations of the observed bond lengths with respect to the radii of Shannon (1976) are already known (Bailey 1984;Gibbs et al 1997;Mercier et al 2006). In particular, Mercier et al (2006) observed that for non end-member single-crystal biotite-1M structure, bond lengths calculated from Shannon's radii tend to overestimate octahedral mean bond lengths between the Fe 2+ and Mg 2+ end-member, whereas the opposite is true when substitution by smaller +3, +4 cations occurs.…”
Section: Crystal Chemistrysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This rotation is defined by the α angle. Crystal chemistry, pressure, and temperature affect the α angle (Comodi and Zanazzi 1997;Mercier et al 2006;Ortega-Castro et al 2010).…”
Section: Crystal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Octahedral sheet distortions can also be expressed by the flattening angle ψ. Composition, crystal chemistry, pressure, and temperature (Brigatti and Guggenheim 2002) affect both the α and the ψ angles (Mercier et al 2006). In muscovite, <α> is affected by pressure in three different regions ( Fig.…”
Section: High-pressure Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%