5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics 2014
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2014.6913787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute and chronic stroke patients: Preliminary results on initial exposure based on kinematic measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this extent, Mazzoleni et al [27] analysed KPs registered by 25 subacute stroke subjects during RT with a planar end-effector robot and found that kinematics significantly improved in the first sessions of treatment, and that a plateau occurred after 10 th session. These results were confirmed in a subsequent study by the same group on 12 subacute and 12 chronic stroke patients [31]. These outcomes were encouraging although a restricted number of patients was recruited, and the analysis of KPs did not investigate whether the recovery was dependent from the direction of the movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this extent, Mazzoleni et al [27] analysed KPs registered by 25 subacute stroke subjects during RT with a planar end-effector robot and found that kinematics significantly improved in the first sessions of treatment, and that a plateau occurred after 10 th session. These results were confirmed in a subsequent study by the same group on 12 subacute and 12 chronic stroke patients [31]. These outcomes were encouraging although a restricted number of patients was recruited, and the analysis of KPs did not investigate whether the recovery was dependent from the direction of the movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…To our knowledge, only Panarese et al [30] analysed the submovements, each in a different direction, finding that motor recovery was direction-dependent. Other published studies are aimed at understanding whether built-in movement measures could be employed in clinical practice for optimizing the length of poststroke RT [27, 31]. To this extent, Mazzoleni et al [27] analysed KPs registered by 25 subacute stroke subjects during RT with a planar end-effector robot and found that kinematics significantly improved in the first sessions of treatment, and that a plateau occurred after 10 th session.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceleration presents few reports of changes after post-stroke therapeutic interventions despite being an important aspect analyzed in kinematic evaluations [21,25,26]. This measure reflects the smoothness of motor activity and implies faster movement onset and greater motor control throughout the action [11,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we also related the results of TDAI with the conventional clinical tests, but few correlations were observed. We credit this to the fact that the evaluated aspects of human movement are different from those measured, since conventional clinical instruments have results on ordinal scales (REACH and ARAT) or number of cubes transported (BBT), while the device has numerical results corresponding to temporal variables [27,32,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More relevant to rehabilitation robotics, this framework has been shown to apply even in severely impaired individuals: movement onset and cessation is from rest or at low speed if transitioning in a movement re-direction; velocity profiles are typically single or multiple peaked (Trombly, 1993;Cirstea and Levin, 2000;Rohrer et al, 2002;Wininger et al, 2009). To wit, this principle is embedded in robot-based assistive technology (Patton and Mussa-Ivaldi, 2004;Kahn et al, 2006;Velliste et al, 2008;Mazzoleni et al, 2014). And while not an explicit requirement for our algorithm, we note that a bell-shaped velocity profile is typical of a healthy actor, and conformity to a bell-shaped template is an indication of motoric recovery (Trombly, 1993;Rohrer et al, 2002).…”
Section: Key Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%