2015
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-12-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper limb kinematics after cervical spinal cord injury: a review

Abstract: Although a number of upper limb kinematic studies have been conducted, no review actually addresses the key-features of open-chain upper limb movements after cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). The aim of this literature review is to provide a clear understanding of motor control and kinematic changes during open-chain upper limb reaching, reach-to-grasp, overhead movements, and fast elbow flexion movements after tetraplegia. Using data from MEDLINE between 1966 and December 2014, we examined temporal and spati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The longer movement time was primarily due to a prolonged deceleration phase when compared to UP and final adjustment phase when compared to YA (Fig 2c and 2d). The prolonged low velocity phase suggests a more corrective mode of movement control, possibly mediated by visual feedback [28], while the overall motor slowing following cSCI, has been thought to occur in order to maintain end-point accuracy and due to declines in triceps strength [10]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The longer movement time was primarily due to a prolonged deceleration phase when compared to UP and final adjustment phase when compared to YA (Fig 2c and 2d). The prolonged low velocity phase suggests a more corrective mode of movement control, possibly mediated by visual feedback [28], while the overall motor slowing following cSCI, has been thought to occur in order to maintain end-point accuracy and due to declines in triceps strength [10]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to uninjured participants (UP), the transport phase of a unimanual reach-to-grasp in individuals with a cSCI, is slower [10], longer in duration [1113], with a longer deceleration phase; which is suggested to represent the need to use visual feedback to guide the hand to the object [1114]. During grasping, maximal grasp aperture is scaled to object size [15], but performed earlier in the transport phase, resulting in the reach and grasp being performed sequentially [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an almost infinite number of different configurations and functions, hand mobility likely involves complex brain control. Indeed, the straightforward execution of highly skilled manual movements can be severely impaired if the connection between the central nervous system and the periphery is damaged (review in Mateo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Classification and Modeling Techniques For Neuroprostheticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While lateral prehension can serve both precision and power functions, it is among the most common grips for picking up small objects (42), and also represents a type of grip that is more frequently used by person with tetraplegia compared to tip-to-tip grip (43). During testing, the UE was stabilized on an adjustable height table in a standardized position with forearm resting, shoulder at 30°–40° flexion, adduction, and neutral rotation, elbow flexed to 90°, wrist in neutral.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%