2000
DOI: 10.5038/1937-8602.45.2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper Jurassic - Lower Cretaceous deposits in the South-Western part of Padurea Craiului. Formal lithostratigraphic units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the adopted stratigraphical scheme of the Pădurea Craiului region (Cociuba, 2000), carbonate deposits of this age are known within the Vârciorog Formation, being previously attributed to the so-called "Upper Pachyodont Limestones" (fide Patrulius, in Ianovici et al, 1976). It is worth to mention that in the type-section of the Vârciorog Formations these limestones are not more than 15-20 m in thickness, while in the Subpiată section they are 120 m thick.…”
Section: Subpiatră Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the adopted stratigraphical scheme of the Pădurea Craiului region (Cociuba, 2000), carbonate deposits of this age are known within the Vârciorog Formation, being previously attributed to the so-called "Upper Pachyodont Limestones" (fide Patrulius, in Ianovici et al, 1976). It is worth to mention that in the type-section of the Vârciorog Formations these limestones are not more than 15-20 m in thickness, while in the Subpiată section they are 120 m thick.…”
Section: Subpiatră Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional contribution was provided by Dragastan et al (1989), Bucur et al (1993), Bucur & Cociuba (1996, and Cociuba (1999Cociuba ( , 2000. Establishing a clear stratigraphical succession of the Lower Cretaceous in Pădurea Craiului is not straightforward, as proven by the two main opinions expressed in the stratigraphical schemes elaborated by Dragastan et al (1989) and Dragastan & Ciobanu (2002) on the one hand, and by Bucur & Cociuba (1988), Cociuba (1999Cociuba ( , 2000, Bucur (2000) and Bucur & Cociuba (2001) on the other. The current paper adopted the latter point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies on micropaleontological associations and lithostratigraphical units here were published by Dragastan (1966), Bucur (1981aBucur ( , 1981bBucur ( , 1985, Dragastan et al (1986), Bucur (1988), Dragastan et al (1988), Bucur (1992Bucur ( , 1995, Bucur et al (1993), Cociuba (1996, 1998), Cociuba (1995Cociuba ( , 1997, Dragastan (1999) and by Dragastan and Ciobanu (2002). The most recent contributions on the lithostratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous in this area belong to Cociuba (1999Cociuba ( , 2000, and Bucur et al (2008Bucur et al ( , 2010.…”
Section: Introduction and Geological Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area under study has a complex structure and the detailed geological setting is still not completely defined. Here we use the lithostratigraphical units separated by Bucur and Cociuba (1996), Cociuba (1999Cociuba ( , 2000, and (Fig. 2): (Dragastan et al, 1986(Dragastan et al, , 1988.…”
Section: Introduction and Geological Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%