2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-012-1386-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with NSAIDs, other drugs and interactions: a nested case–control study in a new general practice database

Abstract: The increased risk of UGIB associated with NSAIDs was lower than previously reported, which could partly be explained by methodological differences, but a decreasing burden over time of this drug safety problem is suggested. BIFAP has shown to be a valuable tool for pharmacoepidemiological research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
49
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In a Japanese retrospective case-control study by Sakamoto et al [5], the OR of upper GI bleeding was 5.5 for LDA and 6.1 for NSAIDs. However, it should be noted that in those case-control studies, the controls were selected from patients who were admitted during the same period or from population registries in the same district [3][4][5][8][9][10][11][12][13]. As a consequence, it remains unclear whether LDA and NSAIDs increase the risk of gastroduodenal mucosal lesions, the risk of bleeding from the mucosal lesions, or both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a Japanese retrospective case-control study by Sakamoto et al [5], the OR of upper GI bleeding was 5.5 for LDA and 6.1 for NSAIDs. However, it should be noted that in those case-control studies, the controls were selected from patients who were admitted during the same period or from population registries in the same district [3][4][5][8][9][10][11][12][13]. As a consequence, it remains unclear whether LDA and NSAIDs increase the risk of gastroduodenal mucosal lesions, the risk of bleeding from the mucosal lesions, or both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The proportion and magnitude of chart review necessary for each study appears to vary based on the specific diagnoses/conditions of interest for each investigation. In a manner similar to our use of i2b2, de Abajo and colleagues used a primary care research database to identify patients with a condition of interest based on administrative coding, and then conducted chart review based on the initial query [7]. In their study, the investigators initially identified cases with a diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleed based on International Classification of Primary Care Code or free text related to UGI bleed, which was screened via natural language processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'peptic ulcer' [28]) which are not specified as bleeding in MedDRA. Indeed one may observe gastric ulcers or gastric perforation that might not be associated with bleeding.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the EU-ADR project [26] and reused in the Safety of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (SOS) European project [27]. Whereas the MedDRA SMQ does not contain the 'Melena' and 'Hematemesis' PT, such terms were selected in studies focusing on UGIB [26,28] and we expect that addition of such terms might be desirable. But, contrary to these studies we chose to exclude from the UGIB grouping terms describing perforations (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%