2012
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper extremity rehabilitation of stroke: Facilitation of corticospinal excitability using virtual mirror paradigm

Abstract: BackgroundSeveral experimental studies in stroke patients suggest that mirror therapy and various virtual reality programs facilitate motor rehabilitation. However, the underlying mechanisms for these therapeutic effects have not been previously described.ObjectivesWe attempted to delineate the changes in corticospinal excitability when individuals were asked to exercise their upper extremity using a real mirror and virtual mirror. Moreover, we attempted to delineate the role of visual modulation within the vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
57
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
57
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A study that compared VR based mirror feedback to regular mirror therapy in a sample of subjects with mild to moderate upper extremity hemiparesis found increased corticospinal excitability of the ipsilesional M1 in both treatment groups; with the VR based method showing the larger change in MEP amplitude and latency. [22] However, it is important to note that this single study does not provide definitive support that VR based visual priming is superior to traditionally presented visual priming. With regards to neural correlates, our group has demonstrated in chronic stroke that virtual mirror training activates regions in the sensory-motor cortex similar to those activated by volitional movement of the affected hand, suggesting that this type of feedback may facilitate regions that are relevant for motor control in individuals with moderate hemiparesis post-stroke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study that compared VR based mirror feedback to regular mirror therapy in a sample of subjects with mild to moderate upper extremity hemiparesis found increased corticospinal excitability of the ipsilesional M1 in both treatment groups; with the VR based method showing the larger change in MEP amplitude and latency. [22] However, it is important to note that this single study does not provide definitive support that VR based visual priming is superior to traditionally presented visual priming. With regards to neural correlates, our group has demonstrated in chronic stroke that virtual mirror training activates regions in the sensory-motor cortex similar to those activated by volitional movement of the affected hand, suggesting that this type of feedback may facilitate regions that are relevant for motor control in individuals with moderate hemiparesis post-stroke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…[23] Furthermore, a study by Kang et al[22] demonstrated greater cortical excitability of the affected hemisphere using VR based visual mirror feedback as compared to a mirror box or control. Although there is no direct evidence, it is interesting to consider that the increase in maximal pinch force in the affected hand after the priming tasks for four of the five subjects may have been related to an increase in ipsilesional cortical excitability induced by these tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study showed that, when the mirror image and proprioceptive illusions were in the same direction, they reinforced each other. A previous study with healthy subjects and stroke patients showed that the rates of amplitude increment and latency decrement of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were higher when using a virtual mirror compared to a real mirror [41]. It is suggested that the reason for this MEP enhancement could be the more interactive and task oriented characteristics of the virtual mirror, leading to increased attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore repetitive stimulation increased muscle strength and prevent more damage of the neuromuscular and prevent its spread to other areas [2]. Cortex area of human brain which called F5 with respect to its role in motor movements and visuomotor that send signals when observing, imitating or copying the certain action of what is observed so that the person imagination activated the movement area same as the actual movement.Ease of Use [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mirror will provide visual stimulation to the brain (cerebral motor nerves i.e. ipsilateral or contralateral for hemiparesis movement) and the hemiparesis will be observed and imitated like the one in the mirror [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%